- This topic has 86 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 2 months ago by
Pasadena Broker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 29, 2008 at 9:58 AM #144467January 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM #144731
Anonymous
GuestUnfortunately, I think the term prudent saver now means someone who is willing to take some risk to beat inflation. While that kind of goes against being prudent, getting 4% while the dollar drops 10% is a guaranteed loss.
January 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM #144971Anonymous
GuestUnfortunately, I think the term prudent saver now means someone who is willing to take some risk to beat inflation. While that kind of goes against being prudent, getting 4% while the dollar drops 10% is a guaranteed loss.
January 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM #144972Anonymous
GuestUnfortunately, I think the term prudent saver now means someone who is willing to take some risk to beat inflation. While that kind of goes against being prudent, getting 4% while the dollar drops 10% is a guaranteed loss.
January 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM #144997Anonymous
GuestUnfortunately, I think the term prudent saver now means someone who is willing to take some risk to beat inflation. While that kind of goes against being prudent, getting 4% while the dollar drops 10% is a guaranteed loss.
January 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM #144999Anonymous
GuestUnfortunately, I think the term prudent saver now means someone who is willing to take some risk to beat inflation. While that kind of goes against being prudent, getting 4% while the dollar drops 10% is a guaranteed loss.
January 29, 2008 at 2:57 PM #145070Anonymous
GuestUnfortunately, I think the term prudent saver now means someone who is willing to take some risk to beat inflation. While that kind of goes against being prudent, getting 4% while the dollar drops 10% is a guaranteed loss.
January 29, 2008 at 4:21 PM #145085barnaby33
ParticipantOf course, what else really matters?
Not sure if that was an attack or not, if so its pretty weak. As someone who was an admitted enabler of the fiasco we are now living through you hardly get to point the finger.
Just because I was too morally weak too lever up to the hilt last go-round, doesn’t mean I didn’t learn my lesson.
Josh
January 29, 2008 at 4:21 PM #145156barnaby33
ParticipantOf course, what else really matters?
Not sure if that was an attack or not, if so its pretty weak. As someone who was an admitted enabler of the fiasco we are now living through you hardly get to point the finger.
Just because I was too morally weak too lever up to the hilt last go-round, doesn’t mean I didn’t learn my lesson.
Josh
January 29, 2008 at 4:21 PM #145082barnaby33
ParticipantOf course, what else really matters?
Not sure if that was an attack or not, if so its pretty weak. As someone who was an admitted enabler of the fiasco we are now living through you hardly get to point the finger.
Just because I was too morally weak too lever up to the hilt last go-round, doesn’t mean I didn’t learn my lesson.
Josh
January 29, 2008 at 4:21 PM #145056barnaby33
ParticipantOf course, what else really matters?
Not sure if that was an attack or not, if so its pretty weak. As someone who was an admitted enabler of the fiasco we are now living through you hardly get to point the finger.
Just because I was too morally weak too lever up to the hilt last go-round, doesn’t mean I didn’t learn my lesson.
Josh
January 29, 2008 at 4:21 PM #144816barnaby33
ParticipantOf course, what else really matters?
Not sure if that was an attack or not, if so its pretty weak. As someone who was an admitted enabler of the fiasco we are now living through you hardly get to point the finger.
Just because I was too morally weak too lever up to the hilt last go-round, doesn’t mean I didn’t learn my lesson.
Josh
January 29, 2008 at 6:26 PM #145153kewp
ParticipantDid anyone else see this?
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/bank-reserves-go-negative.html
I would think the banks having no cash might be a bit of a problem?
January 29, 2008 at 6:26 PM #144916kewp
ParticipantDid anyone else see this?
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/bank-reserves-go-negative.html
I would think the banks having no cash might be a bit of a problem?
January 29, 2008 at 6:26 PM #145182kewp
ParticipantDid anyone else see this?
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/bank-reserves-go-negative.html
I would think the banks having no cash might be a bit of a problem?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.