- This topic has 235 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM #16546October 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM #472895patbParticipant
weak price growth and rising unemployment vitiates against
flipping.sure if you see a really cool warehouse and you want to put in
lofts sure, but expect it to sell at 200+/SF not 500+sure foreclosed propertes that need some clean up you can
burnish and sell but the market is moving slowOctober 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM #473073patbParticipantweak price growth and rising unemployment vitiates against
flipping.sure if you see a really cool warehouse and you want to put in
lofts sure, but expect it to sell at 200+/SF not 500+sure foreclosed propertes that need some clean up you can
burnish and sell but the market is moving slowOctober 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM #473438patbParticipantweak price growth and rising unemployment vitiates against
flipping.sure if you see a really cool warehouse and you want to put in
lofts sure, but expect it to sell at 200+/SF not 500+sure foreclosed propertes that need some clean up you can
burnish and sell but the market is moving slowOctober 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM #473514patbParticipantweak price growth and rising unemployment vitiates against
flipping.sure if you see a really cool warehouse and you want to put in
lofts sure, but expect it to sell at 200+/SF not 500+sure foreclosed propertes that need some clean up you can
burnish and sell but the market is moving slowOctober 23, 2009 at 4:52 PM #473737patbParticipantweak price growth and rising unemployment vitiates against
flipping.sure if you see a really cool warehouse and you want to put in
lofts sure, but expect it to sell at 200+/SF not 500+sure foreclosed propertes that need some clean up you can
burnish and sell but the market is moving slowOctober 24, 2009 at 1:40 AM #473065CA renterParticipantThe flippers/speculators have been out there in large numbers over the past year. We saw them coming back into the market in February of **2008**.
Yes, what you’re worrying about has already been happening. This is where many of these “all cash” offers are coming from.
Though I’m a housing bear right now, and don’t like programs that subsidize housing purchases for the poor (especially low down payment programs, and gimmicky interest rate mortgages), I DO believe home ownership should be a goal, as it does create more stable communities, and it can indeed provide a more stable living situation for many families. If the govt truly believed in affordable home ownership, they would eliminate Prop 13 protection for investment properties and second homes (possible exemptions for multi-family dwellings designed as rentals, and for SFHs that agree to rent control laws). Also, I would eliminate the ability to deduct mortgage interest and property taxes on rentals (but with the same exemptions as above).
There is no need for taxpayers to subsidize a landlord’s profits, and that’s what’s happening with both Prop 13 and MID and property tax deductions.
October 24, 2009 at 1:40 AM #473245CA renterParticipantThe flippers/speculators have been out there in large numbers over the past year. We saw them coming back into the market in February of **2008**.
Yes, what you’re worrying about has already been happening. This is where many of these “all cash” offers are coming from.
Though I’m a housing bear right now, and don’t like programs that subsidize housing purchases for the poor (especially low down payment programs, and gimmicky interest rate mortgages), I DO believe home ownership should be a goal, as it does create more stable communities, and it can indeed provide a more stable living situation for many families. If the govt truly believed in affordable home ownership, they would eliminate Prop 13 protection for investment properties and second homes (possible exemptions for multi-family dwellings designed as rentals, and for SFHs that agree to rent control laws). Also, I would eliminate the ability to deduct mortgage interest and property taxes on rentals (but with the same exemptions as above).
There is no need for taxpayers to subsidize a landlord’s profits, and that’s what’s happening with both Prop 13 and MID and property tax deductions.
October 24, 2009 at 1:40 AM #473608CA renterParticipantThe flippers/speculators have been out there in large numbers over the past year. We saw them coming back into the market in February of **2008**.
Yes, what you’re worrying about has already been happening. This is where many of these “all cash” offers are coming from.
Though I’m a housing bear right now, and don’t like programs that subsidize housing purchases for the poor (especially low down payment programs, and gimmicky interest rate mortgages), I DO believe home ownership should be a goal, as it does create more stable communities, and it can indeed provide a more stable living situation for many families. If the govt truly believed in affordable home ownership, they would eliminate Prop 13 protection for investment properties and second homes (possible exemptions for multi-family dwellings designed as rentals, and for SFHs that agree to rent control laws). Also, I would eliminate the ability to deduct mortgage interest and property taxes on rentals (but with the same exemptions as above).
There is no need for taxpayers to subsidize a landlord’s profits, and that’s what’s happening with both Prop 13 and MID and property tax deductions.
October 24, 2009 at 1:40 AM #473685CA renterParticipantThe flippers/speculators have been out there in large numbers over the past year. We saw them coming back into the market in February of **2008**.
Yes, what you’re worrying about has already been happening. This is where many of these “all cash” offers are coming from.
Though I’m a housing bear right now, and don’t like programs that subsidize housing purchases for the poor (especially low down payment programs, and gimmicky interest rate mortgages), I DO believe home ownership should be a goal, as it does create more stable communities, and it can indeed provide a more stable living situation for many families. If the govt truly believed in affordable home ownership, they would eliminate Prop 13 protection for investment properties and second homes (possible exemptions for multi-family dwellings designed as rentals, and for SFHs that agree to rent control laws). Also, I would eliminate the ability to deduct mortgage interest and property taxes on rentals (but with the same exemptions as above).
There is no need for taxpayers to subsidize a landlord’s profits, and that’s what’s happening with both Prop 13 and MID and property tax deductions.
October 24, 2009 at 1:40 AM #473911CA renterParticipantThe flippers/speculators have been out there in large numbers over the past year. We saw them coming back into the market in February of **2008**.
Yes, what you’re worrying about has already been happening. This is where many of these “all cash” offers are coming from.
Though I’m a housing bear right now, and don’t like programs that subsidize housing purchases for the poor (especially low down payment programs, and gimmicky interest rate mortgages), I DO believe home ownership should be a goal, as it does create more stable communities, and it can indeed provide a more stable living situation for many families. If the govt truly believed in affordable home ownership, they would eliminate Prop 13 protection for investment properties and second homes (possible exemptions for multi-family dwellings designed as rentals, and for SFHs that agree to rent control laws). Also, I would eliminate the ability to deduct mortgage interest and property taxes on rentals (but with the same exemptions as above).
There is no need for taxpayers to subsidize a landlord’s profits, and that’s what’s happening with both Prop 13 and MID and property tax deductions.
October 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM #473182jimmyleParticipantMy aunt bought 5 SFHs in the last two years with positive cash flow after taking in the rent, and paying tax. However, she is in for the long term. Not flipping.
October 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM #473363jimmyleParticipantMy aunt bought 5 SFHs in the last two years with positive cash flow after taking in the rent, and paying tax. However, she is in for the long term. Not flipping.
October 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM #473723jimmyleParticipantMy aunt bought 5 SFHs in the last two years with positive cash flow after taking in the rent, and paying tax. However, she is in for the long term. Not flipping.
October 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM #473801jimmyleParticipantMy aunt bought 5 SFHs in the last two years with positive cash flow after taking in the rent, and paying tax. However, she is in for the long term. Not flipping.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.