- This topic has 70 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by pemeliza.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 15, 2010 at 1:42 PM #18078October 15, 2010 at 1:50 PM #618660faterikcartmanParticipant
Sorry I can’t help — but the response begs the question: have you also looked at the interior of the other homes you’re supposedly using as a reference? I’m guessing no — so what’s the point?
Will they reveal the comparables they used beyond the broad generalities they listed or are you left at their mercy with no clear cut idea how they made their valuation?
I’ll be watching this with earnest as others with more expertise chime in.
October 15, 2010 at 1:50 PM #618743faterikcartmanParticipantSorry I can’t help — but the response begs the question: have you also looked at the interior of the other homes you’re supposedly using as a reference? I’m guessing no — so what’s the point?
Will they reveal the comparables they used beyond the broad generalities they listed or are you left at their mercy with no clear cut idea how they made their valuation?
I’ll be watching this with earnest as others with more expertise chime in.
October 15, 2010 at 1:50 PM #619731faterikcartmanParticipantSorry I can’t help — but the response begs the question: have you also looked at the interior of the other homes you’re supposedly using as a reference? I’m guessing no — so what’s the point?
Will they reveal the comparables they used beyond the broad generalities they listed or are you left at their mercy with no clear cut idea how they made their valuation?
I’ll be watching this with earnest as others with more expertise chime in.
October 15, 2010 at 1:50 PM #619293faterikcartmanParticipantSorry I can’t help — but the response begs the question: have you also looked at the interior of the other homes you’re supposedly using as a reference? I’m guessing no — so what’s the point?
Will they reveal the comparables they used beyond the broad generalities they listed or are you left at their mercy with no clear cut idea how they made their valuation?
I’ll be watching this with earnest as others with more expertise chime in.
October 15, 2010 at 1:50 PM #619411faterikcartmanParticipantSorry I can’t help — but the response begs the question: have you also looked at the interior of the other homes you’re supposedly using as a reference? I’m guessing no — so what’s the point?
Will they reveal the comparables they used beyond the broad generalities they listed or are you left at their mercy with no clear cut idea how they made their valuation?
I’ll be watching this with earnest as others with more expertise chime in.
October 15, 2010 at 2:07 PM #618670ljinvestorParticipantI have seen 5-10 pictures of each comp that I submitted and have driven by most before.
I am still waiting to hear from them on how they made the valuation and what comps were used. They are willing to meet face to face so I want to be ready.
October 15, 2010 at 2:07 PM #619741ljinvestorParticipantI have seen 5-10 pictures of each comp that I submitted and have driven by most before.
I am still waiting to hear from them on how they made the valuation and what comps were used. They are willing to meet face to face so I want to be ready.
October 15, 2010 at 2:07 PM #618753ljinvestorParticipantI have seen 5-10 pictures of each comp that I submitted and have driven by most before.
I am still waiting to hear from them on how they made the valuation and what comps were used. They are willing to meet face to face so I want to be ready.
October 15, 2010 at 2:07 PM #619302ljinvestorParticipantI have seen 5-10 pictures of each comp that I submitted and have driven by most before.
I am still waiting to hear from them on how they made the valuation and what comps were used. They are willing to meet face to face so I want to be ready.
October 15, 2010 at 2:07 PM #619420ljinvestorParticipantI have seen 5-10 pictures of each comp that I submitted and have driven by most before.
I am still waiting to hear from them on how they made the valuation and what comps were used. They are willing to meet face to face so I want to be ready.
October 15, 2010 at 2:18 PM #619746daveljParticipant[quote=ljinvestor] So you know, price per square foot is not an acceptable appraisal methodology. [/quote]
Ummm… I will agree that price per square foot ALONE is not an acceptable appraisal methodology. But if you look at most appraisals – which are a complete joke – just about ALL they focus on is price per square foot with “adjustments.” Now I don’t think this is the right way to appraise homes, but this is the way it is. So, I’m a little baffled by the appraiser’s comments to you on this point.
Personally, I think an income (re: rental equivalent) component should be integrated into SFR appraisals, but that will happen when pigs fly.
October 15, 2010 at 2:18 PM #619307daveljParticipant[quote=ljinvestor] So you know, price per square foot is not an acceptable appraisal methodology. [/quote]
Ummm… I will agree that price per square foot ALONE is not an acceptable appraisal methodology. But if you look at most appraisals – which are a complete joke – just about ALL they focus on is price per square foot with “adjustments.” Now I don’t think this is the right way to appraise homes, but this is the way it is. So, I’m a little baffled by the appraiser’s comments to you on this point.
Personally, I think an income (re: rental equivalent) component should be integrated into SFR appraisals, but that will happen when pigs fly.
October 15, 2010 at 2:18 PM #619425daveljParticipant[quote=ljinvestor] So you know, price per square foot is not an acceptable appraisal methodology. [/quote]
Ummm… I will agree that price per square foot ALONE is not an acceptable appraisal methodology. But if you look at most appraisals – which are a complete joke – just about ALL they focus on is price per square foot with “adjustments.” Now I don’t think this is the right way to appraise homes, but this is the way it is. So, I’m a little baffled by the appraiser’s comments to you on this point.
Personally, I think an income (re: rental equivalent) component should be integrated into SFR appraisals, but that will happen when pigs fly.
October 15, 2010 at 2:18 PM #618758daveljParticipant[quote=ljinvestor] So you know, price per square foot is not an acceptable appraisal methodology. [/quote]
Ummm… I will agree that price per square foot ALONE is not an acceptable appraisal methodology. But if you look at most appraisals – which are a complete joke – just about ALL they focus on is price per square foot with “adjustments.” Now I don’t think this is the right way to appraise homes, but this is the way it is. So, I’m a little baffled by the appraiser’s comments to you on this point.
Personally, I think an income (re: rental equivalent) component should be integrated into SFR appraisals, but that will happen when pigs fly.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.