Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Appeal your tax assessment
- This topic has 35 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by
LAAFTERHOURS.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2009 at 11:42 AM #451010August 29, 2009 at 5:05 PM #450560
EconProf
ParticipantXBoxBoy: They are required by law to respond within two years and are now flooded with 45,000 appeals. That is exactly why you are in a good negotiating position now if you appeal. I sat in on a hearing, and they took an average of 20 – 30 minutes to hear each case since it is like a courtroom proceedure. They got through about sic in the morning session. Clearly only a tiny percentage get past the stipulation/compromise stage.
In one Florida jurisdiction they also were flooded with appeals, had a two-year time limit, and ended up forced to give each taxpayer appeal exactly what they demanded.August 29, 2009 at 5:05 PM #451091EconProf
ParticipantXBoxBoy: They are required by law to respond within two years and are now flooded with 45,000 appeals. That is exactly why you are in a good negotiating position now if you appeal. I sat in on a hearing, and they took an average of 20 – 30 minutes to hear each case since it is like a courtroom proceedure. They got through about sic in the morning session. Clearly only a tiny percentage get past the stipulation/compromise stage.
In one Florida jurisdiction they also were flooded with appeals, had a two-year time limit, and ended up forced to give each taxpayer appeal exactly what they demanded.August 29, 2009 at 5:05 PM #451163EconProf
ParticipantXBoxBoy: They are required by law to respond within two years and are now flooded with 45,000 appeals. That is exactly why you are in a good negotiating position now if you appeal. I sat in on a hearing, and they took an average of 20 – 30 minutes to hear each case since it is like a courtroom proceedure. They got through about sic in the morning session. Clearly only a tiny percentage get past the stipulation/compromise stage.
In one Florida jurisdiction they also were flooded with appeals, had a two-year time limit, and ended up forced to give each taxpayer appeal exactly what they demanded.August 29, 2009 at 5:05 PM #451355EconProf
ParticipantXBoxBoy: They are required by law to respond within two years and are now flooded with 45,000 appeals. That is exactly why you are in a good negotiating position now if you appeal. I sat in on a hearing, and they took an average of 20 – 30 minutes to hear each case since it is like a courtroom proceedure. They got through about sic in the morning session. Clearly only a tiny percentage get past the stipulation/compromise stage.
In one Florida jurisdiction they also were flooded with appeals, had a two-year time limit, and ended up forced to give each taxpayer appeal exactly what they demanded.August 29, 2009 at 5:05 PM #450751EconProf
ParticipantXBoxBoy: They are required by law to respond within two years and are now flooded with 45,000 appeals. That is exactly why you are in a good negotiating position now if you appeal. I sat in on a hearing, and they took an average of 20 – 30 minutes to hear each case since it is like a courtroom proceedure. They got through about sic in the morning session. Clearly only a tiny percentage get past the stipulation/compromise stage.
In one Florida jurisdiction they also were flooded with appeals, had a two-year time limit, and ended up forced to give each taxpayer appeal exactly what they demanded.August 29, 2009 at 5:33 PM #450580EconProf
ParticipantPatientRenter: That is a fair question.
As SDRealtor often cites, people sometimes have to move when their personal situation dictates it, irrespective of where we are in the housing cycle. In our case we were newly empty nesters, sought to escape our busy and noisy street in Scripps Ranch, and fell in love with the perfect house in the perfect setting.
I had long predicted the RE mania would end and had sold a lot of San Diego RE investments accordingly, some with huge gains. I predicted the market would stop rising, but not fall much. I was sooo wrong. Looking back, I should have rented after selling out at the peak. Hindsight is perfect.August 29, 2009 at 5:33 PM #451375EconProf
ParticipantPatientRenter: That is a fair question.
As SDRealtor often cites, people sometimes have to move when their personal situation dictates it, irrespective of where we are in the housing cycle. In our case we were newly empty nesters, sought to escape our busy and noisy street in Scripps Ranch, and fell in love with the perfect house in the perfect setting.
I had long predicted the RE mania would end and had sold a lot of San Diego RE investments accordingly, some with huge gains. I predicted the market would stop rising, but not fall much. I was sooo wrong. Looking back, I should have rented after selling out at the peak. Hindsight is perfect.August 29, 2009 at 5:33 PM #451111EconProf
ParticipantPatientRenter: That is a fair question.
As SDRealtor often cites, people sometimes have to move when their personal situation dictates it, irrespective of where we are in the housing cycle. In our case we were newly empty nesters, sought to escape our busy and noisy street in Scripps Ranch, and fell in love with the perfect house in the perfect setting.
I had long predicted the RE mania would end and had sold a lot of San Diego RE investments accordingly, some with huge gains. I predicted the market would stop rising, but not fall much. I was sooo wrong. Looking back, I should have rented after selling out at the peak. Hindsight is perfect.August 29, 2009 at 5:33 PM #450772EconProf
ParticipantPatientRenter: That is a fair question.
As SDRealtor often cites, people sometimes have to move when their personal situation dictates it, irrespective of where we are in the housing cycle. In our case we were newly empty nesters, sought to escape our busy and noisy street in Scripps Ranch, and fell in love with the perfect house in the perfect setting.
I had long predicted the RE mania would end and had sold a lot of San Diego RE investments accordingly, some with huge gains. I predicted the market would stop rising, but not fall much. I was sooo wrong. Looking back, I should have rented after selling out at the peak. Hindsight is perfect.August 29, 2009 at 5:33 PM #451183EconProf
ParticipantPatientRenter: That is a fair question.
As SDRealtor often cites, people sometimes have to move when their personal situation dictates it, irrespective of where we are in the housing cycle. In our case we were newly empty nesters, sought to escape our busy and noisy street in Scripps Ranch, and fell in love with the perfect house in the perfect setting.
I had long predicted the RE mania would end and had sold a lot of San Diego RE investments accordingly, some with huge gains. I predicted the market would stop rising, but not fall much. I was sooo wrong. Looking back, I should have rented after selling out at the peak. Hindsight is perfect.August 29, 2009 at 7:09 PM #451380patientrenter
ParticipantEconProf, I had assumed you’d invested, net, at the peak, but it sounds like you actually disinvested on a net basis. (When you bought your primary residence you sold a prior primary, and you sold investment properties without repurchasing.)
August 29, 2009 at 7:09 PM #451116patientrenter
ParticipantEconProf, I had assumed you’d invested, net, at the peak, but it sounds like you actually disinvested on a net basis. (When you bought your primary residence you sold a prior primary, and you sold investment properties without repurchasing.)
August 29, 2009 at 7:09 PM #451188patientrenter
ParticipantEconProf, I had assumed you’d invested, net, at the peak, but it sounds like you actually disinvested on a net basis. (When you bought your primary residence you sold a prior primary, and you sold investment properties without repurchasing.)
August 29, 2009 at 7:09 PM #450585patientrenter
ParticipantEconProf, I had assumed you’d invested, net, at the peak, but it sounds like you actually disinvested on a net basis. (When you bought your primary residence you sold a prior primary, and you sold investment properties without repurchasing.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.