- This topic has 25 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by
GoUSC.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 12, 2008 at 7:02 PM #12083March 12, 2008 at 7:19 PM #168225
equalizer
ParticipantDon’t worry about the laws, govt’s pass illegal laws and it takes several years, if ever, for some do-gooder to overthrow the law. For example the illegal san diego county tax from the 90’s.
However, the ramifications of the bill will be swift and just. The MBS investors will demand higher rates and most loans will pass through Fannie/Freddie or other nationalized lenders. Barrons stated that Fannie/Freddie bonds have to stay solvent because China, Japan are major holders, but the stocks may go to BK.March 12, 2008 at 7:19 PM #168656equalizer
ParticipantDon’t worry about the laws, govt’s pass illegal laws and it takes several years, if ever, for some do-gooder to overthrow the law. For example the illegal san diego county tax from the 90’s.
However, the ramifications of the bill will be swift and just. The MBS investors will demand higher rates and most loans will pass through Fannie/Freddie or other nationalized lenders. Barrons stated that Fannie/Freddie bonds have to stay solvent because China, Japan are major holders, but the stocks may go to BK.March 12, 2008 at 7:19 PM #168553equalizer
ParticipantDon’t worry about the laws, govt’s pass illegal laws and it takes several years, if ever, for some do-gooder to overthrow the law. For example the illegal san diego county tax from the 90’s.
However, the ramifications of the bill will be swift and just. The MBS investors will demand higher rates and most loans will pass through Fannie/Freddie or other nationalized lenders. Barrons stated that Fannie/Freddie bonds have to stay solvent because China, Japan are major holders, but the stocks may go to BK.March 12, 2008 at 7:19 PM #168556equalizer
ParticipantDon’t worry about the laws, govt’s pass illegal laws and it takes several years, if ever, for some do-gooder to overthrow the law. For example the illegal san diego county tax from the 90’s.
However, the ramifications of the bill will be swift and just. The MBS investors will demand higher rates and most loans will pass through Fannie/Freddie or other nationalized lenders. Barrons stated that Fannie/Freddie bonds have to stay solvent because China, Japan are major holders, but the stocks may go to BK.March 12, 2008 at 7:19 PM #168584equalizer
ParticipantDon’t worry about the laws, govt’s pass illegal laws and it takes several years, if ever, for some do-gooder to overthrow the law. For example the illegal san diego county tax from the 90’s.
However, the ramifications of the bill will be swift and just. The MBS investors will demand higher rates and most loans will pass through Fannie/Freddie or other nationalized lenders. Barrons stated that Fannie/Freddie bonds have to stay solvent because China, Japan are major holders, but the stocks may go to BK.March 12, 2008 at 8:07 PM #168575Anonymous
GuestProbably because it doesn’t impair the contract. There seem to be 2 options; stick to the original contract and have the homeowner and the investors get nothing, or rework it so that both parties get a little something.
How does this impair the obligations of a contract?
March 12, 2008 at 8:07 PM #168678Anonymous
GuestProbably because it doesn’t impair the contract. There seem to be 2 options; stick to the original contract and have the homeowner and the investors get nothing, or rework it so that both parties get a little something.
How does this impair the obligations of a contract?
March 12, 2008 at 8:07 PM #168604Anonymous
GuestProbably because it doesn’t impair the contract. There seem to be 2 options; stick to the original contract and have the homeowner and the investors get nothing, or rework it so that both parties get a little something.
How does this impair the obligations of a contract?
March 12, 2008 at 8:07 PM #168573Anonymous
GuestProbably because it doesn’t impair the contract. There seem to be 2 options; stick to the original contract and have the homeowner and the investors get nothing, or rework it so that both parties get a little something.
How does this impair the obligations of a contract?
March 12, 2008 at 8:07 PM #168245Anonymous
GuestProbably because it doesn’t impair the contract. There seem to be 2 options; stick to the original contract and have the homeowner and the investors get nothing, or rework it so that both parties get a little something.
How does this impair the obligations of a contract?
March 12, 2008 at 8:14 PM #168578Jay-man
ParticipantWellllll…the Constitution only counts to the extent that people think it counts. It can say one thing and if public opinion believes the opposite – and the courts support the public opinion – then that’s what counts.
Opinion = reality in other words
March 12, 2008 at 8:14 PM #168581Jay-man
ParticipantWellllll…the Constitution only counts to the extent that people think it counts. It can say one thing and if public opinion believes the opposite – and the courts support the public opinion – then that’s what counts.
Opinion = reality in other words
March 12, 2008 at 8:14 PM #168683Jay-man
ParticipantWellllll…the Constitution only counts to the extent that people think it counts. It can say one thing and if public opinion believes the opposite – and the courts support the public opinion – then that’s what counts.
Opinion = reality in other words
March 12, 2008 at 8:14 PM #168250Jay-man
ParticipantWellllll…the Constitution only counts to the extent that people think it counts. It can say one thing and if public opinion believes the opposite – and the courts support the public opinion – then that’s what counts.
Opinion = reality in other words
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.