- This topic has 95 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 20, 2009 at 12:14 PM #370404March 20, 2009 at 12:30 PM #370419peterbParticipant
I said this about 4 months ago as well. But what does HLS say? He’s the one here that really knows this stuff. How real is it?
March 20, 2009 at 12:30 PM #371026peterbParticipantI said this about 4 months ago as well. But what does HLS say? He’s the one here that really knows this stuff. How real is it?
March 20, 2009 at 12:30 PM #370704peterbParticipantI said this about 4 months ago as well. But what does HLS say? He’s the one here that really knows this stuff. How real is it?
March 20, 2009 at 12:30 PM #370870peterbParticipantI said this about 4 months ago as well. But what does HLS say? He’s the one here that really knows this stuff. How real is it?
March 20, 2009 at 12:30 PM #370911peterbParticipantI said this about 4 months ago as well. But what does HLS say? He’s the one here that really knows this stuff. How real is it?
March 20, 2009 at 12:49 PM #371056aldanteParticipantSorry to break up the group hug. SDrealtor are figging serious? You think that there “many more people with money then without”. You are way out there my man. There are less people with a whole lot more money. In case you have not heard our nation has lost 18% wealth. That is the greatest loss ever. This blog used to not be a place for realtors to get new business. But now I guess it is. I find your views completely biased and self serving
March 20, 2009 at 12:49 PM #370943aldanteParticipantSorry to break up the group hug. SDrealtor are figging serious? You think that there “many more people with money then without”. You are way out there my man. There are less people with a whole lot more money. In case you have not heard our nation has lost 18% wealth. That is the greatest loss ever. This blog used to not be a place for realtors to get new business. But now I guess it is. I find your views completely biased and self serving
March 20, 2009 at 12:49 PM #370733aldanteParticipantSorry to break up the group hug. SDrealtor are figging serious? You think that there “many more people with money then without”. You are way out there my man. There are less people with a whole lot more money. In case you have not heard our nation has lost 18% wealth. That is the greatest loss ever. This blog used to not be a place for realtors to get new business. But now I guess it is. I find your views completely biased and self serving
March 20, 2009 at 12:49 PM #370449aldanteParticipantSorry to break up the group hug. SDrealtor are figging serious? You think that there “many more people with money then without”. You are way out there my man. There are less people with a whole lot more money. In case you have not heard our nation has lost 18% wealth. That is the greatest loss ever. This blog used to not be a place for realtors to get new business. But now I guess it is. I find your views completely biased and self serving
March 20, 2009 at 12:49 PM #370900aldanteParticipantSorry to break up the group hug. SDrealtor are figging serious? You think that there “many more people with money then without”. You are way out there my man. There are less people with a whole lot more money. In case you have not heard our nation has lost 18% wealth. That is the greatest loss ever. This blog used to not be a place for realtors to get new business. But now I guess it is. I find your views completely biased and self serving
March 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM #370905sdcellarParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]There are plenty of people with money out there. Far more than not I beleive.[/quote]Countywide? Countrywide? I’m not so sure about that. Sure plenty of people with money, but they can’t do it alone.
[quote=sdrealtor]The psychology is such that they are not spending. This would stimulate every sector of the economy.[/quote]As with all things, there are different folks at different strata. Those who truly have money are still spending it (I think). Each step down is probably tighter and there are many who probabably can’t/won’t play in the re-fi party.
[quote=sdrealtor]Putting discretionary income income the hands of the financial disciplined masses would do alot to help fix our imbalance over time.[/quote]I’m not completely sure this is going to address the psychology issue. You said there are plenty of people with money (and likely at very low risk), what’s stopping them right now?
One answer might be job uncertainty. Well, if it’s that, an extra few-hundo a month ain’t gonna give anybody the warm fuzzies.
All my pushback aside, it’s pretty undeniable that lower interest rates will help. It’s the extent that’s in question and, of course, we can only go so far with it.
Consumption seems to have caught up with us and the world is paying the price right now, I’m just not sure where the tab ends. (sheesh, that sounds a lot more doom and gloom than I mean to be or even am–guess it’s just the relative unchartedness of all of this)
March 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM #371061sdcellarParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]There are plenty of people with money out there. Far more than not I beleive.[/quote]Countywide? Countrywide? I’m not so sure about that. Sure plenty of people with money, but they can’t do it alone.
[quote=sdrealtor]The psychology is such that they are not spending. This would stimulate every sector of the economy.[/quote]As with all things, there are different folks at different strata. Those who truly have money are still spending it (I think). Each step down is probably tighter and there are many who probabably can’t/won’t play in the re-fi party.
[quote=sdrealtor]Putting discretionary income income the hands of the financial disciplined masses would do alot to help fix our imbalance over time.[/quote]I’m not completely sure this is going to address the psychology issue. You said there are plenty of people with money (and likely at very low risk), what’s stopping them right now?
One answer might be job uncertainty. Well, if it’s that, an extra few-hundo a month ain’t gonna give anybody the warm fuzzies.
All my pushback aside, it’s pretty undeniable that lower interest rates will help. It’s the extent that’s in question and, of course, we can only go so far with it.
Consumption seems to have caught up with us and the world is paying the price right now, I’m just not sure where the tab ends. (sheesh, that sounds a lot more doom and gloom than I mean to be or even am–guess it’s just the relative unchartedness of all of this)
March 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM #370948sdcellarParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]There are plenty of people with money out there. Far more than not I beleive.[/quote]Countywide? Countrywide? I’m not so sure about that. Sure plenty of people with money, but they can’t do it alone.
[quote=sdrealtor]The psychology is such that they are not spending. This would stimulate every sector of the economy.[/quote]As with all things, there are different folks at different strata. Those who truly have money are still spending it (I think). Each step down is probably tighter and there are many who probabably can’t/won’t play in the re-fi party.
[quote=sdrealtor]Putting discretionary income income the hands of the financial disciplined masses would do alot to help fix our imbalance over time.[/quote]I’m not completely sure this is going to address the psychology issue. You said there are plenty of people with money (and likely at very low risk), what’s stopping them right now?
One answer might be job uncertainty. Well, if it’s that, an extra few-hundo a month ain’t gonna give anybody the warm fuzzies.
All my pushback aside, it’s pretty undeniable that lower interest rates will help. It’s the extent that’s in question and, of course, we can only go so far with it.
Consumption seems to have caught up with us and the world is paying the price right now, I’m just not sure where the tab ends. (sheesh, that sounds a lot more doom and gloom than I mean to be or even am–guess it’s just the relative unchartedness of all of this)
March 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM #370738sdcellarParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]There are plenty of people with money out there. Far more than not I beleive.[/quote]Countywide? Countrywide? I’m not so sure about that. Sure plenty of people with money, but they can’t do it alone.
[quote=sdrealtor]The psychology is such that they are not spending. This would stimulate every sector of the economy.[/quote]As with all things, there are different folks at different strata. Those who truly have money are still spending it (I think). Each step down is probably tighter and there are many who probabably can’t/won’t play in the re-fi party.
[quote=sdrealtor]Putting discretionary income income the hands of the financial disciplined masses would do alot to help fix our imbalance over time.[/quote]I’m not completely sure this is going to address the psychology issue. You said there are plenty of people with money (and likely at very low risk), what’s stopping them right now?
One answer might be job uncertainty. Well, if it’s that, an extra few-hundo a month ain’t gonna give anybody the warm fuzzies.
All my pushback aside, it’s pretty undeniable that lower interest rates will help. It’s the extent that’s in question and, of course, we can only go so far with it.
Consumption seems to have caught up with us and the world is paying the price right now, I’m just not sure where the tab ends. (sheesh, that sounds a lot more doom and gloom than I mean to be or even am–guess it’s just the relative unchartedness of all of this)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.