It’s anything but a bi-partisan compromise. Not a single Republican voted for it. Even if it gets through the Senate, Bush will veto it and Democrats don’t have Republican support to override the veto.
It’s anything but a bi-partisan compromise. Not a single Republican voted for it. Even if it gets through the Senate, Bush will veto it and Democrats don’t have Republican support to override the veto.
ah shucks, you’re right esmith. I guess I better go back and try to figure out the cost effectiveness of how much stock to dump before the end of the year.
You’d think that government would want to encouage people to cash out investments to stay afloat (you know squeeze every last penny out of people) but at the same time I guess the economy doesn’t need a big sell-off in the stock market either.
ah shucks, you’re right esmith. I guess I better go back and try to figure out the cost effectiveness of how much stock to dump before the end of the year.
You’d think that government would want to encouage people to cash out investments to stay afloat (you know squeeze every last penny out of people) but at the same time I guess the economy doesn’t need a big sell-off in the stock market either.
ah shucks, you’re right esmith. I guess I better go back and try to figure out the cost effectiveness of how much stock to dump before the end of the year.
You’d think that government would want to encouage people to cash out investments to stay afloat (you know squeeze every last penny out of people) but at the same time I guess the economy doesn’t need a big sell-off in the stock market either.
ah shucks, you’re right esmith. I guess I better go back and try to figure out the cost effectiveness of how much stock to dump before the end of the year.
You’d think that government would want to encouage people to cash out investments to stay afloat (you know squeeze every last penny out of people) but at the same time I guess the economy doesn’t need a big sell-off in the stock market either.
.
