- This topic has 45 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 1 month ago by
kewp.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 31, 2007 at 10:17 PM #94102November 1, 2007 at 12:11 AM #94086
nostradamus
Participant4.4 M homes for sale
13.5M homes vacant due to foreclosureI smell a bank conspiracy! If the banks foreclose on everone, but don’t re-sell the property, they can control inventory! They can just hold out, like they did in Boston! Evil!
November 1, 2007 at 12:11 AM #94123nostradamus
Participant4.4 M homes for sale
13.5M homes vacant due to foreclosureI smell a bank conspiracy! If the banks foreclose on everone, but don’t re-sell the property, they can control inventory! They can just hold out, like they did in Boston! Evil!
November 1, 2007 at 12:11 AM #94131nostradamus
Participant4.4 M homes for sale
13.5M homes vacant due to foreclosureI smell a bank conspiracy! If the banks foreclose on everone, but don’t re-sell the property, they can control inventory! They can just hold out, like they did in Boston! Evil!
November 1, 2007 at 5:08 AM #940944plexowner
ParticipantHere’s Mish’s take on these numbers – by his calculations there are 15.8 vacant homes total (listed & unlisted) – he makes some observations that hadn’t occurred to me
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/10/pent-up-housing-supply.html
November 1, 2007 at 5:08 AM #941324plexowner
ParticipantHere’s Mish’s take on these numbers – by his calculations there are 15.8 vacant homes total (listed & unlisted) – he makes some observations that hadn’t occurred to me
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/10/pent-up-housing-supply.html
November 1, 2007 at 5:08 AM #941394plexowner
ParticipantHere’s Mish’s take on these numbers – by his calculations there are 15.8 vacant homes total (listed & unlisted) – he makes some observations that hadn’t occurred to me
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2007/10/pent-up-housing-supply.html
November 1, 2007 at 7:08 AM #94116kewp
ParticipantI smell a bank conspiracy! If the banks foreclose on everone, but don’t re-sell the property, they can control inventory! They can just hold out, like they did in Boston! Evil!
In any other industry this would be racketeering.
November 1, 2007 at 7:08 AM #94153kewp
ParticipantI smell a bank conspiracy! If the banks foreclose on everone, but don’t re-sell the property, they can control inventory! They can just hold out, like they did in Boston! Evil!
In any other industry this would be racketeering.
November 1, 2007 at 7:08 AM #94161kewp
ParticipantI smell a bank conspiracy! If the banks foreclose on everone, but don’t re-sell the property, they can control inventory! They can just hold out, like they did in Boston! Evil!
In any other industry this would be racketeering.
November 1, 2007 at 9:04 AM #94134cr
Participant“Hard to imagine that there are 13.5 million people in America who can afford to let a house sit vacant”
A majority of those are probably bank owned or owned by builders or those who financed the builders.
Banks would have no reason to hold on to millions of dollars of unsold homes in a depreciating market. They’ll sell, just look at Countrywide’s foreclosure listings. They add more everyday.
November 1, 2007 at 9:04 AM #94171cr
Participant“Hard to imagine that there are 13.5 million people in America who can afford to let a house sit vacant”
A majority of those are probably bank owned or owned by builders or those who financed the builders.
Banks would have no reason to hold on to millions of dollars of unsold homes in a depreciating market. They’ll sell, just look at Countrywide’s foreclosure listings. They add more everyday.
November 1, 2007 at 9:04 AM #94180cr
Participant“Hard to imagine that there are 13.5 million people in America who can afford to let a house sit vacant”
A majority of those are probably bank owned or owned by builders or those who financed the builders.
Banks would have no reason to hold on to millions of dollars of unsold homes in a depreciating market. They’ll sell, just look at Countrywide’s foreclosure listings. They add more everyday.
November 1, 2007 at 9:24 AM #94142kewp
ParticipantBanks would have no reason to hold on to millions of dollars of unsold homes in a depreciating market.
They sure do, when each sale lowers the value of all the rest!
November 1, 2007 at 9:24 AM #94178kewp
ParticipantBanks would have no reason to hold on to millions of dollars of unsold homes in a depreciating market.
They sure do, when each sale lowers the value of all the rest!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
