- This topic has 130 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by greekfire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 28, 2008 at 5:42 PM #263113August 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM #262886greekfireParticipant
The more desirable coastal areas are indeed stickier on the way down, but come down they will. IMHO there is a LOT of credit created by the real estate bubble that will eventually be cleansed from the system. For the high-end real estate it’s a waiting game…a staring contest at this point. Don’t blink and you’ll be rewarded.
August 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM #263092greekfireParticipantThe more desirable coastal areas are indeed stickier on the way down, but come down they will. IMHO there is a LOT of credit created by the real estate bubble that will eventually be cleansed from the system. For the high-end real estate it’s a waiting game…a staring contest at this point. Don’t blink and you’ll be rewarded.
August 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM #263098greekfireParticipantThe more desirable coastal areas are indeed stickier on the way down, but come down they will. IMHO there is a LOT of credit created by the real estate bubble that will eventually be cleansed from the system. For the high-end real estate it’s a waiting game…a staring contest at this point. Don’t blink and you’ll be rewarded.
August 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM #263150greekfireParticipantThe more desirable coastal areas are indeed stickier on the way down, but come down they will. IMHO there is a LOT of credit created by the real estate bubble that will eventually be cleansed from the system. For the high-end real estate it’s a waiting game…a staring contest at this point. Don’t blink and you’ll be rewarded.
August 28, 2008 at 11:02 PM #263187greekfireParticipantThe more desirable coastal areas are indeed stickier on the way down, but come down they will. IMHO there is a LOT of credit created by the real estate bubble that will eventually be cleansed from the system. For the high-end real estate it’s a waiting game…a staring contest at this point. Don’t blink and you’ll be rewarded.
August 28, 2008 at 11:08 PM #262866peterbParticipantAlt A’s loans are sketchy not only for their option subset, but also because they relied very heavily on one’s FICO score rather than detailed documentation and I am not sure about how much they required for down payments as well. So you can have these as “liar” loans as well as “walkaway” potential…i.e. they’re still shakey due to other factors besides not having neg-am, interest-only type options. Terrible thing about devaluation is that it makes all debt more burdensome, even the “good” debt.
Tax relief act of 2008 allows one to default on their home mortgage without getting hit with the IRS considering the defaulted amount as a gain to the person defaulting. Since this may not last forever, I would think it an incentive to walk away if you were already feeling crappy about your debt.
One more very important thing to keep in mind is the study done by the Boston Fed regarding the effect negative equity has on default rates. Basically, the biggest indicator of the probability of someone defaulting on a loan is if they are in a negative equity position. Income level and FICO dont seem to matter nearly as much as if they are upside down in the loan.(And this seems very rational.)Well, I have to believe that many loans made in the last 4 or 5 years are in a negative equity position at this point in CA!Look out below………
August 28, 2008 at 11:08 PM #263074peterbParticipantAlt A’s loans are sketchy not only for their option subset, but also because they relied very heavily on one’s FICO score rather than detailed documentation and I am not sure about how much they required for down payments as well. So you can have these as “liar” loans as well as “walkaway” potential…i.e. they’re still shakey due to other factors besides not having neg-am, interest-only type options. Terrible thing about devaluation is that it makes all debt more burdensome, even the “good” debt.
Tax relief act of 2008 allows one to default on their home mortgage without getting hit with the IRS considering the defaulted amount as a gain to the person defaulting. Since this may not last forever, I would think it an incentive to walk away if you were already feeling crappy about your debt.
One more very important thing to keep in mind is the study done by the Boston Fed regarding the effect negative equity has on default rates. Basically, the biggest indicator of the probability of someone defaulting on a loan is if they are in a negative equity position. Income level and FICO dont seem to matter nearly as much as if they are upside down in the loan.(And this seems very rational.)Well, I have to believe that many loans made in the last 4 or 5 years are in a negative equity position at this point in CA!Look out below………
August 28, 2008 at 11:08 PM #263078peterbParticipantAlt A’s loans are sketchy not only for their option subset, but also because they relied very heavily on one’s FICO score rather than detailed documentation and I am not sure about how much they required for down payments as well. So you can have these as “liar” loans as well as “walkaway” potential…i.e. they’re still shakey due to other factors besides not having neg-am, interest-only type options. Terrible thing about devaluation is that it makes all debt more burdensome, even the “good” debt.
Tax relief act of 2008 allows one to default on their home mortgage without getting hit with the IRS considering the defaulted amount as a gain to the person defaulting. Since this may not last forever, I would think it an incentive to walk away if you were already feeling crappy about your debt.
One more very important thing to keep in mind is the study done by the Boston Fed regarding the effect negative equity has on default rates. Basically, the biggest indicator of the probability of someone defaulting on a loan is if they are in a negative equity position. Income level and FICO dont seem to matter nearly as much as if they are upside down in the loan.(And this seems very rational.)Well, I have to believe that many loans made in the last 4 or 5 years are in a negative equity position at this point in CA!Look out below………
August 28, 2008 at 11:08 PM #263130peterbParticipantAlt A’s loans are sketchy not only for their option subset, but also because they relied very heavily on one’s FICO score rather than detailed documentation and I am not sure about how much they required for down payments as well. So you can have these as “liar” loans as well as “walkaway” potential…i.e. they’re still shakey due to other factors besides not having neg-am, interest-only type options. Terrible thing about devaluation is that it makes all debt more burdensome, even the “good” debt.
Tax relief act of 2008 allows one to default on their home mortgage without getting hit with the IRS considering the defaulted amount as a gain to the person defaulting. Since this may not last forever, I would think it an incentive to walk away if you were already feeling crappy about your debt.
One more very important thing to keep in mind is the study done by the Boston Fed regarding the effect negative equity has on default rates. Basically, the biggest indicator of the probability of someone defaulting on a loan is if they are in a negative equity position. Income level and FICO dont seem to matter nearly as much as if they are upside down in the loan.(And this seems very rational.)Well, I have to believe that many loans made in the last 4 or 5 years are in a negative equity position at this point in CA!Look out below………
August 28, 2008 at 11:08 PM #263167peterbParticipantAlt A’s loans are sketchy not only for their option subset, but also because they relied very heavily on one’s FICO score rather than detailed documentation and I am not sure about how much they required for down payments as well. So you can have these as “liar” loans as well as “walkaway” potential…i.e. they’re still shakey due to other factors besides not having neg-am, interest-only type options. Terrible thing about devaluation is that it makes all debt more burdensome, even the “good” debt.
Tax relief act of 2008 allows one to default on their home mortgage without getting hit with the IRS considering the defaulted amount as a gain to the person defaulting. Since this may not last forever, I would think it an incentive to walk away if you were already feeling crappy about your debt.
One more very important thing to keep in mind is the study done by the Boston Fed regarding the effect negative equity has on default rates. Basically, the biggest indicator of the probability of someone defaulting on a loan is if they are in a negative equity position. Income level and FICO dont seem to matter nearly as much as if they are upside down in the loan.(And this seems very rational.)Well, I have to believe that many loans made in the last 4 or 5 years are in a negative equity position at this point in CA!Look out below………
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.