- This topic has 40 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM #129928January 5, 2008 at 11:06 AM #130117Allan from FallbrookParticipant
Josh: No, Fallbrook does not have an acreage minimum. My understanding is that Bonsall does, though. I know the Rolling Hills Estates properties require a 2ac minimum, and several of the other developments require them as well.
The neighborhood I am in is older, and the lots are bigger as a result (we are on 1.2ac). The newer developments don’t have lots that large, but they are considerably bigger than the cheek to jowl developments you see in Temecula or Murrieta.
Bunny: Fallbrook is definitely eclectic. You have a real interesting mix of artists/artisans, Marines (current and retired) and Mexican/Central American.
January 5, 2008 at 11:06 AM #130121Allan from FallbrookParticipantJosh: No, Fallbrook does not have an acreage minimum. My understanding is that Bonsall does, though. I know the Rolling Hills Estates properties require a 2ac minimum, and several of the other developments require them as well.
The neighborhood I am in is older, and the lots are bigger as a result (we are on 1.2ac). The newer developments don’t have lots that large, but they are considerably bigger than the cheek to jowl developments you see in Temecula or Murrieta.
Bunny: Fallbrook is definitely eclectic. You have a real interesting mix of artists/artisans, Marines (current and retired) and Mexican/Central American.
January 5, 2008 at 11:06 AM #130220Allan from FallbrookParticipantJosh: No, Fallbrook does not have an acreage minimum. My understanding is that Bonsall does, though. I know the Rolling Hills Estates properties require a 2ac minimum, and several of the other developments require them as well.
The neighborhood I am in is older, and the lots are bigger as a result (we are on 1.2ac). The newer developments don’t have lots that large, but they are considerably bigger than the cheek to jowl developments you see in Temecula or Murrieta.
Bunny: Fallbrook is definitely eclectic. You have a real interesting mix of artists/artisans, Marines (current and retired) and Mexican/Central American.
January 5, 2008 at 11:06 AM #129943Allan from FallbrookParticipantJosh: No, Fallbrook does not have an acreage minimum. My understanding is that Bonsall does, though. I know the Rolling Hills Estates properties require a 2ac minimum, and several of the other developments require them as well.
The neighborhood I am in is older, and the lots are bigger as a result (we are on 1.2ac). The newer developments don’t have lots that large, but they are considerably bigger than the cheek to jowl developments you see in Temecula or Murrieta.
Bunny: Fallbrook is definitely eclectic. You have a real interesting mix of artists/artisans, Marines (current and retired) and Mexican/Central American.
January 5, 2008 at 11:06 AM #130189Allan from FallbrookParticipantJosh: No, Fallbrook does not have an acreage minimum. My understanding is that Bonsall does, though. I know the Rolling Hills Estates properties require a 2ac minimum, and several of the other developments require them as well.
The neighborhood I am in is older, and the lots are bigger as a result (we are on 1.2ac). The newer developments don’t have lots that large, but they are considerably bigger than the cheek to jowl developments you see in Temecula or Murrieta.
Bunny: Fallbrook is definitely eclectic. You have a real interesting mix of artists/artisans, Marines (current and retired) and Mexican/Central American.
January 5, 2008 at 11:50 AM #130209NotCrankyParticipantPunk ass bitch,
I mean JoshEvery legal lot has a minmimum size or density to go with it. The size varies in Fallbrook as it does in other in parts of the county according to the general plan and other limitations.The state requires that all counties have a general plan.
I don’t know Fallbrook very well but it is possible some parcels have to stay very large. Perhaps because they are in ground water or septic system dependent areas,agricultural areas or flood plain areas. There definitely is a large minimum size for some parcels.Obviously many areas have been zoned for much higher density.January 5, 2008 at 11:50 AM #130241NotCrankyParticipantPunk ass bitch,
I mean JoshEvery legal lot has a minmimum size or density to go with it. The size varies in Fallbrook as it does in other in parts of the county according to the general plan and other limitations.The state requires that all counties have a general plan.
I don’t know Fallbrook very well but it is possible some parcels have to stay very large. Perhaps because they are in ground water or septic system dependent areas,agricultural areas or flood plain areas. There definitely is a large minimum size for some parcels.Obviously many areas have been zoned for much higher density.January 5, 2008 at 11:50 AM #130141NotCrankyParticipantPunk ass bitch,
I mean JoshEvery legal lot has a minmimum size or density to go with it. The size varies in Fallbrook as it does in other in parts of the county according to the general plan and other limitations.The state requires that all counties have a general plan.
I don’t know Fallbrook very well but it is possible some parcels have to stay very large. Perhaps because they are in ground water or septic system dependent areas,agricultural areas or flood plain areas. There definitely is a large minimum size for some parcels.Obviously many areas have been zoned for much higher density.January 5, 2008 at 11:50 AM #130138NotCrankyParticipantPunk ass bitch,
I mean JoshEvery legal lot has a minmimum size or density to go with it. The size varies in Fallbrook as it does in other in parts of the county according to the general plan and other limitations.The state requires that all counties have a general plan.
I don’t know Fallbrook very well but it is possible some parcels have to stay very large. Perhaps because they are in ground water or septic system dependent areas,agricultural areas or flood plain areas. There definitely is a large minimum size for some parcels.Obviously many areas have been zoned for much higher density.January 5, 2008 at 11:50 AM #129963NotCrankyParticipantPunk ass bitch,
I mean JoshEvery legal lot has a minmimum size or density to go with it. The size varies in Fallbrook as it does in other in parts of the county according to the general plan and other limitations.The state requires that all counties have a general plan.
I don’t know Fallbrook very well but it is possible some parcels have to stay very large. Perhaps because they are in ground water or septic system dependent areas,agricultural areas or flood plain areas. There definitely is a large minimum size for some parcels.Obviously many areas have been zoned for much higher density. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.