- This topic has 200 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
DoJC.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 28, 2008 at 3:51 PM #144451January 28, 2008 at 4:02 PM #144129
JWM in SD
ParticipantJWM in SD
No, I wasn’t surprised at all. Should it really be that surprising when you consider that they were really speculators to begin with? It’s reprehensible, but perfectly legal. Look, I don’t like FBs as much as anyone else, but, I want them to stick it to the lenders as much as possible.
January 28, 2008 at 4:02 PM #144365ParticipantJWM in SD
No, I wasn’t surprised at all. Should it really be that surprising when you consider that they were really speculators to begin with? It’s reprehensible, but perfectly legal. Look, I don’t like FBs as much as anyone else, but, I want them to stick it to the lenders as much as possible.
January 28, 2008 at 4:02 PM #144369ParticipantJWM in SD
No, I wasn’t surprised at all. Should it really be that surprising when you consider that they were really speculators to begin with? It’s reprehensible, but perfectly legal. Look, I don’t like FBs as much as anyone else, but, I want them to stick it to the lenders as much as possible.
January 28, 2008 at 4:02 PM #144395ParticipantJWM in SD
No, I wasn’t surprised at all. Should it really be that surprising when you consider that they were really speculators to begin with? It’s reprehensible, but perfectly legal. Look, I don’t like FBs as much as anyone else, but, I want them to stick it to the lenders as much as possible.
January 28, 2008 at 4:02 PM #144465ParticipantJWM in SD
No, I wasn’t surprised at all. Should it really be that surprising when you consider that they were really speculators to begin with? It’s reprehensible, but perfectly legal. Look, I don’t like FBs as much as anyone else, but, I want them to stick it to the lenders as much as possible.
January 28, 2008 at 4:29 PM #144137CogSciGuy
ParticipantIt continues to amaze me that people get all worked up when people make the very logical, very legal choice to walk away from houses they’re upside down of. They made no agreement not to do that and to act like they have some kind of moral obligation to the bank to make a stupid financial decision is just silly.
January 28, 2008 at 4:29 PM #144376ParticipantIt continues to amaze me that people get all worked up when people make the very logical, very legal choice to walk away from houses they’re upside down of. They made no agreement not to do that and to act like they have some kind of moral obligation to the bank to make a stupid financial decision is just silly.
January 28, 2008 at 4:29 PM #144378ParticipantIt continues to amaze me that people get all worked up when people make the very logical, very legal choice to walk away from houses they’re upside down of. They made no agreement not to do that and to act like they have some kind of moral obligation to the bank to make a stupid financial decision is just silly.
January 28, 2008 at 4:29 PM #144405ParticipantIt continues to amaze me that people get all worked up when people make the very logical, very legal choice to walk away from houses they’re upside down of. They made no agreement not to do that and to act like they have some kind of moral obligation to the bank to make a stupid financial decision is just silly.
January 28, 2008 at 4:29 PM #144476ParticipantIt continues to amaze me that people get all worked up when people make the very logical, very legal choice to walk away from houses they’re upside down of. They made no agreement not to do that and to act like they have some kind of moral obligation to the bank to make a stupid financial decision is just silly.
January 28, 2008 at 4:38 PM #144142Raybyrnes
ParticipantCogSciGuy
It was a business decision by the bank to make the loan. They profit when things work out and lose money when they don’t. Just a business decision by both parties.
Where is becomes fraudulaent is when people lie or decieve the other party from the borrwer standpoint or when people are encouraged to lie from the broker standpoint.
January 28, 2008 at 4:38 PM #144380ParticipantCogSciGuy
It was a business decision by the bank to make the loan. They profit when things work out and lose money when they don’t. Just a business decision by both parties.
Where is becomes fraudulaent is when people lie or decieve the other party from the borrwer standpoint or when people are encouraged to lie from the broker standpoint.
January 28, 2008 at 4:38 PM #144383ParticipantCogSciGuy
It was a business decision by the bank to make the loan. They profit when things work out and lose money when they don’t. Just a business decision by both parties.
Where is becomes fraudulaent is when people lie or decieve the other party from the borrwer standpoint or when people are encouraged to lie from the broker standpoint.
January 28, 2008 at 4:38 PM #144410ParticipantCogSciGuy
It was a business decision by the bank to make the loan. They profit when things work out and lose money when they don’t. Just a business decision by both parties.
Where is becomes fraudulaent is when people lie or decieve the other party from the borrwer standpoint or when people are encouraged to lie from the broker standpoint.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.