- This topic has 559 replies, 46 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by enron_by_the_sea.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 26, 2009 at 1:06 PM #336984January 26, 2009 at 1:26 PM #336480poway_sellerParticipant
Our billing cycle resets the 16th of every month, so we agreed (wife and I) to start Feb 16th and really go over the top to cut down on as much as possible for 1 month to see what happens (just the easy things, I’m not going to start off by adding extra insulation between the exterior walls and the master bedroom).
shutting off lights, unplugging TVs that aren’t used, unplugging chargers, turn off computer and monitors, all the “easy” stuff.
depending on the outcome we may just go back to old ways if it doesn’t save that much, or go to next phase (whatever that means I don’t know yet)
It’s not the money per se, but more the principal of not wanting to waste it, and perhaps being more environmentally responsible in some small way. (I tried hypermiling my 2004 yukon for a full tank once and it only made mileage about 1-2 mpg more, which only saves me about $1-2 for every 100 miles I drive, hardly worth the extra effort)
Okay, now I’m expecting smart-a$$ comments about driving a yukon (kid, dogs and boat, so necessary), the big house (not necessary but my choice), and now a boat (haven’t used in over a year).
January 26, 2009 at 1:26 PM #336809poway_sellerParticipantOur billing cycle resets the 16th of every month, so we agreed (wife and I) to start Feb 16th and really go over the top to cut down on as much as possible for 1 month to see what happens (just the easy things, I’m not going to start off by adding extra insulation between the exterior walls and the master bedroom).
shutting off lights, unplugging TVs that aren’t used, unplugging chargers, turn off computer and monitors, all the “easy” stuff.
depending on the outcome we may just go back to old ways if it doesn’t save that much, or go to next phase (whatever that means I don’t know yet)
It’s not the money per se, but more the principal of not wanting to waste it, and perhaps being more environmentally responsible in some small way. (I tried hypermiling my 2004 yukon for a full tank once and it only made mileage about 1-2 mpg more, which only saves me about $1-2 for every 100 miles I drive, hardly worth the extra effort)
Okay, now I’m expecting smart-a$$ comments about driving a yukon (kid, dogs and boat, so necessary), the big house (not necessary but my choice), and now a boat (haven’t used in over a year).
January 26, 2009 at 1:26 PM #336896poway_sellerParticipantOur billing cycle resets the 16th of every month, so we agreed (wife and I) to start Feb 16th and really go over the top to cut down on as much as possible for 1 month to see what happens (just the easy things, I’m not going to start off by adding extra insulation between the exterior walls and the master bedroom).
shutting off lights, unplugging TVs that aren’t used, unplugging chargers, turn off computer and monitors, all the “easy” stuff.
depending on the outcome we may just go back to old ways if it doesn’t save that much, or go to next phase (whatever that means I don’t know yet)
It’s not the money per se, but more the principal of not wanting to waste it, and perhaps being more environmentally responsible in some small way. (I tried hypermiling my 2004 yukon for a full tank once and it only made mileage about 1-2 mpg more, which only saves me about $1-2 for every 100 miles I drive, hardly worth the extra effort)
Okay, now I’m expecting smart-a$$ comments about driving a yukon (kid, dogs and boat, so necessary), the big house (not necessary but my choice), and now a boat (haven’t used in over a year).
January 26, 2009 at 1:26 PM #336925poway_sellerParticipantOur billing cycle resets the 16th of every month, so we agreed (wife and I) to start Feb 16th and really go over the top to cut down on as much as possible for 1 month to see what happens (just the easy things, I’m not going to start off by adding extra insulation between the exterior walls and the master bedroom).
shutting off lights, unplugging TVs that aren’t used, unplugging chargers, turn off computer and monitors, all the “easy” stuff.
depending on the outcome we may just go back to old ways if it doesn’t save that much, or go to next phase (whatever that means I don’t know yet)
It’s not the money per se, but more the principal of not wanting to waste it, and perhaps being more environmentally responsible in some small way. (I tried hypermiling my 2004 yukon for a full tank once and it only made mileage about 1-2 mpg more, which only saves me about $1-2 for every 100 miles I drive, hardly worth the extra effort)
Okay, now I’m expecting smart-a$$ comments about driving a yukon (kid, dogs and boat, so necessary), the big house (not necessary but my choice), and now a boat (haven’t used in over a year).
January 26, 2009 at 1:26 PM #337014poway_sellerParticipantOur billing cycle resets the 16th of every month, so we agreed (wife and I) to start Feb 16th and really go over the top to cut down on as much as possible for 1 month to see what happens (just the easy things, I’m not going to start off by adding extra insulation between the exterior walls and the master bedroom).
shutting off lights, unplugging TVs that aren’t used, unplugging chargers, turn off computer and monitors, all the “easy” stuff.
depending on the outcome we may just go back to old ways if it doesn’t save that much, or go to next phase (whatever that means I don’t know yet)
It’s not the money per se, but more the principal of not wanting to waste it, and perhaps being more environmentally responsible in some small way. (I tried hypermiling my 2004 yukon for a full tank once and it only made mileage about 1-2 mpg more, which only saves me about $1-2 for every 100 miles I drive, hardly worth the extra effort)
Okay, now I’m expecting smart-a$$ comments about driving a yukon (kid, dogs and boat, so necessary), the big house (not necessary but my choice), and now a boat (haven’t used in over a year).
January 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM #336505CBadParticipantTo give you a comparison, we are a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 kids) and SDGE is in the 60’s-70’s until we turn on the heat and it can jump up to around $120 as a high. But we have either 1 or none of the things you listed, we can fit 3 of our houses into yours, and live where we don’t need AC.
Personally, I find the overhead recessed lighting to be inefficient. It seems to me like you need more of them to create the same light compared to just your basic overhead light.
January 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM #336833CBadParticipantTo give you a comparison, we are a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 kids) and SDGE is in the 60’s-70’s until we turn on the heat and it can jump up to around $120 as a high. But we have either 1 or none of the things you listed, we can fit 3 of our houses into yours, and live where we don’t need AC.
Personally, I find the overhead recessed lighting to be inefficient. It seems to me like you need more of them to create the same light compared to just your basic overhead light.
January 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM #336921CBadParticipantTo give you a comparison, we are a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 kids) and SDGE is in the 60’s-70’s until we turn on the heat and it can jump up to around $120 as a high. But we have either 1 or none of the things you listed, we can fit 3 of our houses into yours, and live where we don’t need AC.
Personally, I find the overhead recessed lighting to be inefficient. It seems to me like you need more of them to create the same light compared to just your basic overhead light.
January 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM #336950CBadParticipantTo give you a comparison, we are a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 kids) and SDGE is in the 60’s-70’s until we turn on the heat and it can jump up to around $120 as a high. But we have either 1 or none of the things you listed, we can fit 3 of our houses into yours, and live where we don’t need AC.
Personally, I find the overhead recessed lighting to be inefficient. It seems to me like you need more of them to create the same light compared to just your basic overhead light.
January 26, 2009 at 1:50 PM #337039CBadParticipantTo give you a comparison, we are a family of 5 (2 adults, 3 kids) and SDGE is in the 60’s-70’s until we turn on the heat and it can jump up to around $120 as a high. But we have either 1 or none of the things you listed, we can fit 3 of our houses into yours, and live where we don’t need AC.
Personally, I find the overhead recessed lighting to be inefficient. It seems to me like you need more of them to create the same light compared to just your basic overhead light.
January 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM #336495poway_sellerParticipant“So 100 watt burning for an hour will cost 1/10 of a kilowatt hour (100/1000) x the rate of 20 cents or say .02 per hour, or 48 cents a day. So if you left if on for 24 hours and 30 days that 100 watt light bulb would be about $15 bucks a month.”
sounds like my biggest issue may come from lighting as well.. nearly all recessed. I should check the wattage on all. problem is all are on electronic dimmers, and most CFL lightbulbs fail on electronic dimmers. The only ones that I’ve found that work on dimmers are Phillips bulbs and they are $12 each. So multiply that by 100 lights and it gets expensive! Cost vs. savings needed on that one…
Forgot to mention also have 2 40 pint per day capacity dehumifidiers that run 24 hours per day on 1st floor (which is below grade and back wall has moisture to pull out). I guess I need to find the wattage on those.
January 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM #336823poway_sellerParticipant“So 100 watt burning for an hour will cost 1/10 of a kilowatt hour (100/1000) x the rate of 20 cents or say .02 per hour, or 48 cents a day. So if you left if on for 24 hours and 30 days that 100 watt light bulb would be about $15 bucks a month.”
sounds like my biggest issue may come from lighting as well.. nearly all recessed. I should check the wattage on all. problem is all are on electronic dimmers, and most CFL lightbulbs fail on electronic dimmers. The only ones that I’ve found that work on dimmers are Phillips bulbs and they are $12 each. So multiply that by 100 lights and it gets expensive! Cost vs. savings needed on that one…
Forgot to mention also have 2 40 pint per day capacity dehumifidiers that run 24 hours per day on 1st floor (which is below grade and back wall has moisture to pull out). I guess I need to find the wattage on those.
January 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM #336911poway_sellerParticipant“So 100 watt burning for an hour will cost 1/10 of a kilowatt hour (100/1000) x the rate of 20 cents or say .02 per hour, or 48 cents a day. So if you left if on for 24 hours and 30 days that 100 watt light bulb would be about $15 bucks a month.”
sounds like my biggest issue may come from lighting as well.. nearly all recessed. I should check the wattage on all. problem is all are on electronic dimmers, and most CFL lightbulbs fail on electronic dimmers. The only ones that I’ve found that work on dimmers are Phillips bulbs and they are $12 each. So multiply that by 100 lights and it gets expensive! Cost vs. savings needed on that one…
Forgot to mention also have 2 40 pint per day capacity dehumifidiers that run 24 hours per day on 1st floor (which is below grade and back wall has moisture to pull out). I guess I need to find the wattage on those.
January 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM #336940poway_sellerParticipant“So 100 watt burning for an hour will cost 1/10 of a kilowatt hour (100/1000) x the rate of 20 cents or say .02 per hour, or 48 cents a day. So if you left if on for 24 hours and 30 days that 100 watt light bulb would be about $15 bucks a month.”
sounds like my biggest issue may come from lighting as well.. nearly all recessed. I should check the wattage on all. problem is all are on electronic dimmers, and most CFL lightbulbs fail on electronic dimmers. The only ones that I’ve found that work on dimmers are Phillips bulbs and they are $12 each. So multiply that by 100 lights and it gets expensive! Cost vs. savings needed on that one…
Forgot to mention also have 2 40 pint per day capacity dehumifidiers that run 24 hours per day on 1st floor (which is below grade and back wall has moisture to pull out). I guess I need to find the wattage on those.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.