Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 4221 Mount Casas 92117, Clairemont
- This topic has 225 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2008 at 12:01 AM #212531May 28, 2008 at 7:20 AM #212407jimg111Participant
It’s not rebid, it’s called highest and best offer and all banks do it whenever there is a multiple offer situation. Bank then looks at best offer, may not always be price, then decides which to take and that’s it. No crap.
May 28, 2008 at 7:20 AM #212482jimg111ParticipantIt’s not rebid, it’s called highest and best offer and all banks do it whenever there is a multiple offer situation. Bank then looks at best offer, may not always be price, then decides which to take and that’s it. No crap.
May 28, 2008 at 7:20 AM #212509jimg111ParticipantIt’s not rebid, it’s called highest and best offer and all banks do it whenever there is a multiple offer situation. Bank then looks at best offer, may not always be price, then decides which to take and that’s it. No crap.
May 28, 2008 at 7:20 AM #212530jimg111ParticipantIt’s not rebid, it’s called highest and best offer and all banks do it whenever there is a multiple offer situation. Bank then looks at best offer, may not always be price, then decides which to take and that’s it. No crap.
May 28, 2008 at 7:20 AM #212561jimg111ParticipantIt’s not rebid, it’s called highest and best offer and all banks do it whenever there is a multiple offer situation. Bank then looks at best offer, may not always be price, then decides which to take and that’s it. No crap.
May 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #212438(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor those who don;t know what pent-up demand is, this is a demonstration. At the right price there appears to be plenty of demand.
What a bunch of crap they are pulling on this sale…
What if every house in the Clairemont Mount Streets was priced in the 350K range ? Isn’t that what you want ?May 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #212512(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor those who don;t know what pent-up demand is, this is a demonstration. At the right price there appears to be plenty of demand.
What a bunch of crap they are pulling on this sale…
What if every house in the Clairemont Mount Streets was priced in the 350K range ? Isn’t that what you want ?May 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #212539(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor those who don;t know what pent-up demand is, this is a demonstration. At the right price there appears to be plenty of demand.
What a bunch of crap they are pulling on this sale…
What if every house in the Clairemont Mount Streets was priced in the 350K range ? Isn’t that what you want ?May 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #212560(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor those who don;t know what pent-up demand is, this is a demonstration. At the right price there appears to be plenty of demand.
What a bunch of crap they are pulling on this sale…
What if every house in the Clairemont Mount Streets was priced in the 350K range ? Isn’t that what you want ?May 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #212591(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantFor those who don;t know what pent-up demand is, this is a demonstration. At the right price there appears to be plenty of demand.
What a bunch of crap they are pulling on this sale…
What if every house in the Clairemont Mount Streets was priced in the 350K range ? Isn’t that what you want ?May 28, 2008 at 8:08 AM #212452jpinpbParticipantI saw this property and I think 2828 Deerpark was a better deal, in better condition (just outdated) and if you add a second story, a full on bay view. I got a letter from the realtor saying 456k was the highest bid and if I was interested in going higher to let him know b/c he was putting in the package to bank.
I was not interested in getting into a bidding war. I will let this person buy and bring down the comps. 2828 Deerpark was going to foreclosure 5/27. There are NODs in the area. Realtor/owner has one on Deerpark listed for a very long time in same condition for 615k. I think he may want to reconsider that price after this sale goes through. There is also a bank owned on that street that is not in the MLS yet.
I still think of Clairemont as median neighborhood and median should go for 350k max, maybe 400-450k for canyon – and I mean canyon, not Balboa. That’s JMO. From the inventory that is out there, I’m hoping that the decline in prices will continue to that point. Anyone who is foolish enough to get in a bidding war on this Mt. fixer deserves the punishment for it later.
As far as flipping, were the credit standards loosened? Who is going to buy? Is there a burning desire for upper income people to live in Clairemont? I thought the upper income all wanted to live in Carmel Valley/4S Ranch.
Maybe investors buying w/the intention of renting. If that’s the case, I don’t think the numbers add up on ROI.
May 28, 2008 at 8:08 AM #212527jpinpbParticipantI saw this property and I think 2828 Deerpark was a better deal, in better condition (just outdated) and if you add a second story, a full on bay view. I got a letter from the realtor saying 456k was the highest bid and if I was interested in going higher to let him know b/c he was putting in the package to bank.
I was not interested in getting into a bidding war. I will let this person buy and bring down the comps. 2828 Deerpark was going to foreclosure 5/27. There are NODs in the area. Realtor/owner has one on Deerpark listed for a very long time in same condition for 615k. I think he may want to reconsider that price after this sale goes through. There is also a bank owned on that street that is not in the MLS yet.
I still think of Clairemont as median neighborhood and median should go for 350k max, maybe 400-450k for canyon – and I mean canyon, not Balboa. That’s JMO. From the inventory that is out there, I’m hoping that the decline in prices will continue to that point. Anyone who is foolish enough to get in a bidding war on this Mt. fixer deserves the punishment for it later.
As far as flipping, were the credit standards loosened? Who is going to buy? Is there a burning desire for upper income people to live in Clairemont? I thought the upper income all wanted to live in Carmel Valley/4S Ranch.
Maybe investors buying w/the intention of renting. If that’s the case, I don’t think the numbers add up on ROI.
May 28, 2008 at 8:08 AM #212554jpinpbParticipantI saw this property and I think 2828 Deerpark was a better deal, in better condition (just outdated) and if you add a second story, a full on bay view. I got a letter from the realtor saying 456k was the highest bid and if I was interested in going higher to let him know b/c he was putting in the package to bank.
I was not interested in getting into a bidding war. I will let this person buy and bring down the comps. 2828 Deerpark was going to foreclosure 5/27. There are NODs in the area. Realtor/owner has one on Deerpark listed for a very long time in same condition for 615k. I think he may want to reconsider that price after this sale goes through. There is also a bank owned on that street that is not in the MLS yet.
I still think of Clairemont as median neighborhood and median should go for 350k max, maybe 400-450k for canyon – and I mean canyon, not Balboa. That’s JMO. From the inventory that is out there, I’m hoping that the decline in prices will continue to that point. Anyone who is foolish enough to get in a bidding war on this Mt. fixer deserves the punishment for it later.
As far as flipping, were the credit standards loosened? Who is going to buy? Is there a burning desire for upper income people to live in Clairemont? I thought the upper income all wanted to live in Carmel Valley/4S Ranch.
Maybe investors buying w/the intention of renting. If that’s the case, I don’t think the numbers add up on ROI.
May 28, 2008 at 8:08 AM #212575jpinpbParticipantI saw this property and I think 2828 Deerpark was a better deal, in better condition (just outdated) and if you add a second story, a full on bay view. I got a letter from the realtor saying 456k was the highest bid and if I was interested in going higher to let him know b/c he was putting in the package to bank.
I was not interested in getting into a bidding war. I will let this person buy and bring down the comps. 2828 Deerpark was going to foreclosure 5/27. There are NODs in the area. Realtor/owner has one on Deerpark listed for a very long time in same condition for 615k. I think he may want to reconsider that price after this sale goes through. There is also a bank owned on that street that is not in the MLS yet.
I still think of Clairemont as median neighborhood and median should go for 350k max, maybe 400-450k for canyon – and I mean canyon, not Balboa. That’s JMO. From the inventory that is out there, I’m hoping that the decline in prices will continue to that point. Anyone who is foolish enough to get in a bidding war on this Mt. fixer deserves the punishment for it later.
As far as flipping, were the credit standards loosened? Who is going to buy? Is there a burning desire for upper income people to live in Clairemont? I thought the upper income all wanted to live in Carmel Valley/4S Ranch.
Maybe investors buying w/the intention of renting. If that’s the case, I don’t think the numbers add up on ROI.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.