I like the front of it but when you see the side-shot it seems like the rest is a facade of richness.
I agree. From the back with all the glass and views it seems that 1.5M is a bargain. From the street (side) it looks kinda crappy. I think there is no way to judge from the photos. Would have to see it in person.
Okay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
Okay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
Okay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
Okay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
Okay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
