Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 115k loss in Scripps Ranch
- This topic has 80 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 19, 2007 at 2:26 PM #60543June 19, 2007 at 2:26 PM #60509bubble_contagionParticipant
Asianautica: That is so true. Like when sometimes you get in sync with the traffic lights and get all the greens and sometimes all the reds. At least none of us were born before WWII and had to fight a large war.
June 26, 2007 at 10:27 AM #62173DaCounselorParticipant“What about 11294,11246 etc?”
________________________11246 closed on 5/29 for $703.5K. It is a smaller house than 11238. I didn’t see any other sale between it’s ’98 construction and this sale – if that is true and the seller was the original owner, they really cleaned up with this investment. Anyone know what these places were selling for in ’98?
June 26, 2007 at 10:27 AM #62218DaCounselorParticipant“What about 11294,11246 etc?”
________________________11246 closed on 5/29 for $703.5K. It is a smaller house than 11238. I didn’t see any other sale between it’s ’98 construction and this sale – if that is true and the seller was the original owner, they really cleaned up with this investment. Anyone know what these places were selling for in ’98?
June 26, 2007 at 11:07 AM #62183SD RealtorParticipantHi Counselor –
The home that closed for 703.5k was originally sold for (drum roll please) 285k back on 9/20/99. Yeah I would say that the seller did okay. Looks like he pulled out some cash along the way but it seems he still did okay.
SD Realtor
June 26, 2007 at 11:07 AM #62228SD RealtorParticipantHi Counselor –
The home that closed for 703.5k was originally sold for (drum roll please) 285k back on 9/20/99. Yeah I would say that the seller did okay. Looks like he pulled out some cash along the way but it seems he still did okay.
SD Realtor
June 26, 2007 at 2:10 PM #62237what_a_disastaParticipantwhat about 11294 on the same street?
June 26, 2007 at 2:10 PM #62282what_a_disastaParticipantwhat about 11294 on the same street?
June 26, 2007 at 2:13 PM #62239what_a_disastaParticipantand 11224, they are the same ugly 2k ish 4 bedroom model I think.
June 26, 2007 at 2:13 PM #62284what_a_disastaParticipantand 11224, they are the same ugly 2k ish 4 bedroom model I think.
June 26, 2007 at 3:06 PM #62257DaCounselorParticipant“what about 11294 on the same street?”
_______________________sale is pending.
don’t worry, w-a-d, we will eventually find a property in this neighborhood that sells for less than the previous purchase price. the prior two properties you referenced, however, are excellent examples of people making a killing in the RE market…
June 26, 2007 at 3:06 PM #62302DaCounselorParticipant“what about 11294 on the same street?”
_______________________sale is pending.
don’t worry, w-a-d, we will eventually find a property in this neighborhood that sells for less than the previous purchase price. the prior two properties you referenced, however, are excellent examples of people making a killing in the RE market…
June 26, 2007 at 3:24 PM #62259DaCounselorParticipant“The home that closed for 703.5k was originally sold for (drum roll please) 285k back on 9/20/99. Yeah I would say that the seller did okay. Looks like he pulled out some cash along the way but it seems he still did okay.”
___________________________Nice pull on the purchase price SDR. Helocs/refi’s aside and playing the assumption game, with 10% down in ’99, the owners turned a $28.5K investment into about $400K in less than 8 years. Tax free if it’s a couple. Nice. Imagine if they would have opted to buy into and ride the tech stock craze instead…
June 26, 2007 at 3:24 PM #62304DaCounselorParticipant“The home that closed for 703.5k was originally sold for (drum roll please) 285k back on 9/20/99. Yeah I would say that the seller did okay. Looks like he pulled out some cash along the way but it seems he still did okay.”
___________________________Nice pull on the purchase price SDR. Helocs/refi’s aside and playing the assumption game, with 10% down in ’99, the owners turned a $28.5K investment into about $400K in less than 8 years. Tax free if it’s a couple. Nice. Imagine if they would have opted to buy into and ride the tech stock craze instead…
June 26, 2007 at 3:50 PM #62312SD RealtorParticipant11294 is a short sale so the sellers will get hammered. They purchased for 750k at the top of the market.
11224 purchased for 305k in 1999.
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.