Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 11063 Alonda Ct, Mira Mesa
- This topic has 125 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 9, 2009 at 2:31 PM #428309July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM #428164
briansd1
GuestHere’s another Asian (all in good fun here :))
He’s got only one room so not much to rent out.I guess he could close off the living room and rent it out. If he moved back to his parents, he could rent out the bedroom and the living-room separately.
NGUYEN GIANG
425_W_Beech_St_526_San_Diego_CA_92101July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM #428390briansd1
GuestHere’s another Asian (all in good fun here :))
He’s got only one room so not much to rent out.I guess he could close off the living room and rent it out. If he moved back to his parents, he could rent out the bedroom and the living-room separately.
NGUYEN GIANG
425_W_Beech_St_526_San_Diego_CA_92101July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM #428680briansd1
GuestHere’s another Asian (all in good fun here :))
He’s got only one room so not much to rent out.I guess he could close off the living room and rent it out. If he moved back to his parents, he could rent out the bedroom and the living-room separately.
NGUYEN GIANG
425_W_Beech_St_526_San_Diego_CA_92101July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM #428751briansd1
GuestHere’s another Asian (all in good fun here :))
He’s got only one room so not much to rent out.I guess he could close off the living room and rent it out. If he moved back to his parents, he could rent out the bedroom and the living-room separately.
NGUYEN GIANG
425_W_Beech_St_526_San_Diego_CA_92101July 10, 2009 at 1:10 PM #428912briansd1
GuestHere’s another Asian (all in good fun here :))
He’s got only one room so not much to rent out.I guess he could close off the living room and rent it out. If he moved back to his parents, he could rent out the bedroom and the living-room separately.
NGUYEN GIANG
425_W_Beech_St_526_San_Diego_CA_92101July 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM #428174briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Technically, correct. In practice, certain ethnicities tend to think that term to be reserved more exclusively end up classifying others as “pacific islanders,etc”…[/quote]I have a friend from Hong Kong and to him “Asians” are only those of Confucian culture — Chinese, Taiwanese, Korean, Japanese, Singaporeans and Vietnamese.
Southeast Asians would include, Vietnamese (overlap), Thais, Malaysians, Burmese, Laos.
Pacific Islanders would be Filipinos and Indonesians.
South Asians would be Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis. (I know that in UK, “Asian” refers generally to a person from the Indian subcontinent because of the colonial and immigration history)
To my HK friend, when referring to Asians of non-confucian inclination, you would refer to them by the name of country they are from.
It’s like the term American. The United States doesn’t own the word either. Technically, Mexicans, Canadians, El Salvadoreans, etc… are all Americans.
July 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM #428400briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Technically, correct. In practice, certain ethnicities tend to think that term to be reserved more exclusively end up classifying others as “pacific islanders,etc”…[/quote]I have a friend from Hong Kong and to him “Asians” are only those of Confucian culture — Chinese, Taiwanese, Korean, Japanese, Singaporeans and Vietnamese.
Southeast Asians would include, Vietnamese (overlap), Thais, Malaysians, Burmese, Laos.
Pacific Islanders would be Filipinos and Indonesians.
South Asians would be Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis. (I know that in UK, “Asian” refers generally to a person from the Indian subcontinent because of the colonial and immigration history)
To my HK friend, when referring to Asians of non-confucian inclination, you would refer to them by the name of country they are from.
It’s like the term American. The United States doesn’t own the word either. Technically, Mexicans, Canadians, El Salvadoreans, etc… are all Americans.
July 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM #428690briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Technically, correct. In practice, certain ethnicities tend to think that term to be reserved more exclusively end up classifying others as “pacific islanders,etc”…[/quote]I have a friend from Hong Kong and to him “Asians” are only those of Confucian culture — Chinese, Taiwanese, Korean, Japanese, Singaporeans and Vietnamese.
Southeast Asians would include, Vietnamese (overlap), Thais, Malaysians, Burmese, Laos.
Pacific Islanders would be Filipinos and Indonesians.
South Asians would be Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis. (I know that in UK, “Asian” refers generally to a person from the Indian subcontinent because of the colonial and immigration history)
To my HK friend, when referring to Asians of non-confucian inclination, you would refer to them by the name of country they are from.
It’s like the term American. The United States doesn’t own the word either. Technically, Mexicans, Canadians, El Salvadoreans, etc… are all Americans.
July 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM #428760briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Technically, correct. In practice, certain ethnicities tend to think that term to be reserved more exclusively end up classifying others as “pacific islanders,etc”…[/quote]I have a friend from Hong Kong and to him “Asians” are only those of Confucian culture — Chinese, Taiwanese, Korean, Japanese, Singaporeans and Vietnamese.
Southeast Asians would include, Vietnamese (overlap), Thais, Malaysians, Burmese, Laos.
Pacific Islanders would be Filipinos and Indonesians.
South Asians would be Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis. (I know that in UK, “Asian” refers generally to a person from the Indian subcontinent because of the colonial and immigration history)
To my HK friend, when referring to Asians of non-confucian inclination, you would refer to them by the name of country they are from.
It’s like the term American. The United States doesn’t own the word either. Technically, Mexicans, Canadians, El Salvadoreans, etc… are all Americans.
July 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM #428922briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
Technically, correct. In practice, certain ethnicities tend to think that term to be reserved more exclusively end up classifying others as “pacific islanders,etc”…[/quote]I have a friend from Hong Kong and to him “Asians” are only those of Confucian culture — Chinese, Taiwanese, Korean, Japanese, Singaporeans and Vietnamese.
Southeast Asians would include, Vietnamese (overlap), Thais, Malaysians, Burmese, Laos.
Pacific Islanders would be Filipinos and Indonesians.
South Asians would be Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis. (I know that in UK, “Asian” refers generally to a person from the Indian subcontinent because of the colonial and immigration history)
To my HK friend, when referring to Asians of non-confucian inclination, you would refer to them by the name of country they are from.
It’s like the term American. The United States doesn’t own the word either. Technically, Mexicans, Canadians, El Salvadoreans, etc… are all Americans.
July 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM #428223briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
I was referring to something else. But if you don’t get it never mind. I won’t bother to explain it, otherwise I would sound like a shithead. I’ll let some other asian dude explain it.[/quote]hahaha, at first, I didn’t get it but now I do, thanks to your recent reminder. 😉
I have “Asian dude” friends and I do get some of the cultural aspects by osmosis.
July 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM #428449briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
I was referring to something else. But if you don’t get it never mind. I won’t bother to explain it, otherwise I would sound like a shithead. I’ll let some other asian dude explain it.[/quote]hahaha, at first, I didn’t get it but now I do, thanks to your recent reminder. 😉
I have “Asian dude” friends and I do get some of the cultural aspects by osmosis.
July 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM #428738briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
I was referring to something else. But if you don’t get it never mind. I won’t bother to explain it, otherwise I would sound like a shithead. I’ll let some other asian dude explain it.[/quote]hahaha, at first, I didn’t get it but now I do, thanks to your recent reminder. 😉
I have “Asian dude” friends and I do get some of the cultural aspects by osmosis.
July 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM #428810briansd1
Guest[quote=flu]
I was referring to something else. But if you don’t get it never mind. I won’t bother to explain it, otherwise I would sound like a shithead. I’ll let some other asian dude explain it.[/quote]hahaha, at first, I didn’t get it but now I do, thanks to your recent reminder. 😉
I have “Asian dude” friends and I do get some of the cultural aspects by osmosis.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.