You are welcome Counselor,
It’s not that serious. Also,what goes around comes around. You do not seem too adverse to laying it on now and then.
Your answer to FSD is “I thought I had a point there”. You should know wether or not you had a point. You can both agree that you did ,but relative to the thread I don’t see it. Your concerns were addressed before and after you got on the thread and you just kept going on and on.
Your point, whatever it is and you of course are wecome to express it, never was the topic of debate in my opinion. In fact no one debates it at all. Yes,there is no specific 2004 number exclusive of individual comparisions or maybe even inclusive of them.You win!Let me give you an example of how I percieve the comments related to “20XX” as defining a pricing point. My conjecture has it that there is a possibility I could sell my house today and wait a few years and then buy two at 2001-2002 prices. That’s relevant enough for conjecture. If I am off by 40k or 50k It doesn’t matter.We would be talking about 10% of the value on each replacement house. That 10% is miniscule compared to the past appreciation and probable depreciation scenarios.As your friend adn mine FSD would point out ,it is all speculation until it happens anyway. So why would one even bother to be exact at this time? My other point is, why does anyone else have to satisfy your needs to have a discussion arranged with the metrics done your way if nothing being proposed is actually factually corrupt?
2001 prices for everybody!
Best Wishes