Why is that every defense of Obama’s behavior has to be(minimized, justified, validated) ect. by the missteps of Bush. All most all of the replies on this thread defending Obama’s actions are fallacies.
To those who many no know…… a straw man is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue.
Why not address the specific behavior of Obama? Is it really that difficult to defend his positions?
