Wanting the government to act within the bounds set forth in the Constitution is not anarchy.
I wasn’t looking for language specifically dealing with a 1040, I just included that for reference. From what I have gathered so far, the Supreme Court ruled in 1916 that the 16th Amendment gave Congress no new powers of taxation. And “income”, as defined in the Eisner v Montgomery case, is based on corporate gains or profits. I guess this is one of the arguments used by tax protesters.
I don’t necessarily subscribe to all of the viewpoints from the video, but I do find it thought-provoking. If nothing else, it has made me research our laws.