[quote=svelte]BG, you have a real problem with reading comprehension and logic.
In this one thread alone…
[quote=bearishgurl]The map indicates the BY of this property backs up into MM Blvd.[/quote]No, 7510 Bannister does not back up to MM Blvd. The homes on the other side of the street do.
Error 1.[/quote]
LOL, svelte, I think you need to put on your glasses and look at an aerial map …
[quote=svelte][quote=bearishgurl][quote=briansd1]
The image is that of a lower-class Hispanic community with a culture of Tijuana.[/quote]
Not only is your remark about Chula Vista factually false, it is racist. [/quote]
It is factually true – that is the image of CV.[/quote]
Read what you just wrote, svelte … “That is the image…” If you don’t mind my asking, specifically which area of Chula Vista did you live in? With a population of 273K and 5 zip codes, this is a material question …
[quote=svelte]In addition, it is not a racist statement to imply that lower-class Hispanics live in CV. That’s absurd.
Errors 2 and 3.[/quote]
Good l@rd, svelte …
Okay, if you think it’s not racist, I’ll “imply” that “lower class Hispanics” as well as “lower class [multiple races]” live in SM and throughout “Nirvana” and the bulk of inland North County, lol. Just try to refute that!
Is there any zip code in this county which does not have “lower class” residents living there? 92067, maybe?? How about all those “lower class” adult children with their children (grandchildren) rooming in mom and/or dad’s back bedroom in 92067 because they’ve never really been able to get their own sh!t together?? Are they “lower class” by virtue of what they themselves accomplished or did not accomplish or do they retain their “upper” or “upper-middle” class status by virtue of their parent’s status?
Unbelievable!
[quote=svelte][quote=bearishgurl]Also, weren’t you the one who kept saying that San Marcos streets were not up to normal code ordinances, poorly maintained, etc?[/quote]I never stated that SM sts weren’t up to “code ordinances.” I stated the zoning was not there to begin with.[/quote]
Settle down, svelte. I never stated I was an expert on SM. I stated that the dtn area was obviously poorly zoned at the time, based on my observations. This was the case with several areas of the county and still is to some extent. I don’t know what kind (if any) improvements San Marcos has made to its infrastructure and zoning since then.
[quote=bearishgurl][quote=svelte]Actually, svelte, the last time I was in SM (dtn area) was ’99, when I looked at a couple of private-party vehicles from the Auto Trader. One vehicle was located on a street where houses and industrial type warehouses were mixed and some houses also backed into industrial shops/wrhses. Another was on a street which was still a partial dirt road with a dirt driveway.[/quote]This is what irks me the most. You visit a city once 13 years ago (!!!) and you think you’re the expert on the state of their street construction. You must have been looking at some pretty shitty cars, cuz they were definitely not parked on even average SM streets.[/quote]
Actually, both vehicles I went to see were garaged. I was looking at luxury cars at the time and there happened to be a ’94 *rare* “Anniversary Edition” I wanted to see up there with very low miles on it. I wanted to buy it, but it was a weekend and someone else already had the cash on them and beat me to it after I left.
[quote=bearishgurl][quote=svelte]At that time, the area where you live (SEH)…[/quote]WTF??? I *do not* live in SEH!! Error 5.[/quote]
I’m very glad to hear that, svelte. Seriously. I remember you congratulating another Pigg (evolusd?) awhile back who recently purchased in SEH. My bad. I thought you told him you would be his neighbor. Upon further research, I now see you are advising him on multiple tracts in SM.
[quote=bearishgurl][quote=svelte](SEH) was still mostly open space adjacent to a large county landfill that was closed in part because the *new* multimillion-dollar recycling plant it was converted to ended up costing more to run than any potential revenues would generate, lol. After nearly ten years of litigation to expand it …[/quote]What in the world does a failed plan to open a recycling plant have to do with *anything* we were discussing?
Absolutely absurd![/quote]
Not absurd. You pointed out that CV was too expensive for you for what you wanted but you could afford a comparable SFR in SM instead. Hello??? The “closed landfill” is the main reason comparable homes in CV and other SD County cities and communities are more expensive than SM. Obviously, you didn’t look at the map to see several tracts abutting the closed landfill. Hey, put on your glasses and click on it to enlarge it!
Let me ask you, svelte … would YOU live on one of those streets overlooking the covered-over landfill which was used for 14+ years? How about about one or two streets away??
For the record, I have nothing against SM, per se. But given the choice, I would opt to live in a community that does not have environmental issues, i.e. potential radon exposure, tainted soil, tainted groundwater, excessive HP lines. But that’s just me.
