[quote=spdrun]I wonder what the true exposure rate on the Diamond Princess was… about 20% of the people on board tested positive for virus, but that’s not definitive for exposure, since there’s a window in the illness, outside of which, people don’t test positive. It could be nearly 100% exposure and antibodies for all we know. I would love to see a serological survey of all of the passengers on the Princess.
12 people died out of 3700, which means the infection fatality rate could be 0.3%, even with an average population age of 58. Extrapolating this to NY state’s expected 16000 deaths, and assuming a true infection/exposure fatality rate of something like 0.15% to account for a lower average age of 37-38, 10 million people may already be exposed, which means that we’re 2/3 of the way to herd immunity.
The DP incident isn’t a large enough sample to be definative, but it make me wonder if cases in NYC are now slowing because half the state (and probably more than half of the city) are dead-end hosts at this point in time.
If this thing started out with an R0 number of 3.0, 50% immunity would lower it to 1.5, making it roughly as infectious as the flu in the population and only slightly more lethal.[/quote]
math isn’t simple/straightforward because one should account for social-economic factors among other things
for example those who were infected on the cruise ship are on the upper end of the income scale, so we can infer that they have better access to medical care AND perhaps might be in better shape to fight off infections
numbers in New York include the homeless who most likely are not in the best of physical or mental health,… so this population is more likely to become infected simply because their ability to fight off disease isn’t the best AND given the homeless density once infection takes hold it will spread pretty darn fast (a good analogy people in SoCal might relate to is a fast moving firestorm)
