[quote=SK in CV][quote=ucodegen][quote=craptcha]The Benghazi outpost was not an Embassy. And if we are to believe Allan the ambassador was not just a diplomat, but also a facilitator in weapons proliferation scheme.[/quote]Umm.. how about some references to support your contention there? From what I find, it was quite the opposite. There were some weapons, particularly ground to air weapons (ie Stingers) that the US was trying to locate. Remember the empty containers shown on the news? Considering that a 737, 747, 777, A300 etc makes a nice juicy target for a Stinger or similar missile, and it would make a great target/weapon combination for a terrorist.
Did you mean to reply to another post? This comment is entirely non-responsive to the quoted comment.[/quote]
Actually it is right to the point. Read it again. The ref quote indicated: Allan the ambassador was not just a diplomat, but a facilitator in weapons proliferation scheme. I am showing that the real intent of any action there was not weapons proliferation, but bringing some dangerous weapons back into control and remove them from circulation. I also indicated how these weapons would be used by a terrorist. My news link is backup on the ground to air missile.. since I asked for proof on the insinuation of participation in a weapons proliferation scheme.
