This is the commissions website. You can see the report linked on the front page. It was issued and ignored.
I linked to the report in my previous post. It came from the commission, issued on Dec 1, 2010. It came after the co-chairs recommendation, which came in November 2010.
I’ll admit, I read more of the co-chairs recommendations, and that’s what I was thinking of when I said in the previous post that I thought the recommendations were good, albeit painful.
But a quick scan of the full commissions recommendations show it’s similar to the co-chairs list.
