[quote=SK in CV]
Ok, then. Then nothing in that piece of the clip is evidence of Clinton lying. Gowdy claimed Clinton said something. Comey said “that would be false”. That’s not evidence Clinton lied. Because the things that Gowdy claimed Clinton said, were lies. She had never said those things.[/quote]
Humm so this time index about her claiming Emails being on the State Department server does not exist? and that all here Emails were available?
I can find a lot more.. all in her words, recorded.
You also bring into context that 3 (from your link) were not properly marked — leaving approx 2997 marked.
Another note: Per your link;
FBI Director James Comey: no…There were three e-mails. Yhe “c” was in the body, in the text but there was no header on the e-mail or the text.
Rep. Matt Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what’s classified and what’s not classified, and were following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?
FBI Director James Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
That one I would like to see(video).. because if you see the (C) at the top of an email – you may consider that it was cut-pasted, and to ask questions. Markings are not limited to the header. There are top of page requirements, for every page. See your second section
• Conspicuously place the overall classification at the top and bottom of the page.
• Mark other internal pages either with the overall classification or with a marking
indicating the highest classification level of information contained on that page.
NOTE: The per page marking is required in the even the body gets separated from the header or ‘cover page’ on printed versions of the document. It is to also cause the printed to have the markings (not complete markings) should someone print the Email.
Per your quote, it was marked at the top of the page – should have been marked on the header as well. This did not make it unclassisfied.
[quote=SK in CV]They were marked classified. Incorrectly. Which is the same as if they weren’t marked classified at all.[/quote]
You have never handled classified info – that last sentence is incorrect. They were marked, but may have not been marked as per the standard – location on the text, coloring, background. That does NOT make them unclassified.
