[quote=moneymaker]spdrun I’m with you on nuclear as a good form of energy production.[/quote]
Who said you need uranium 235 to produce nuclear power. There’s tons Thorium 232 to be exploited in the US. Of course it’s difficult to build nuclear weapons from a Thorium nuclear fuel cycle.
[quote=moneymaker]
probably not a good idea in places that are known for earthquakes though, i.e. Japan and California.
[/quote]
As long as it’s NIMBY, right? I would agree that CA might be better off with Solar Thermal in the Mohave desert than Uranium PWRs on the coast. Of course we might screw up some some desert snake’s habitat if we do that.