[quote=meadandale][quote=SK in CV][quote=ucodegen]
An individual has much smaller resources than does a large well backed organization. The problem becomes one of trying to upset the one person one vote through mis-information.[/quote]
You mean misinformation like covering Benghazi as if there really was a scandal? You mean misinformation like covering the Clinton foundation as if there really was a scandal? You mean misinformation like covering Clinton’s email server as if there really was a scandal? You mean misinformation like NOT covering the rape of a 13 year old girl by a presidential candidate as if there was no scandal? You mean misinformation like NOT covering bribes paid by the Trump foundation as if there was no scandal? You mean misinformation like covering this election as if it’s close? Yeah, the press has failed quite a bit this election cycle. The first amendment allows all that. In fact, guarantees the right to do all that. But despite all that rigging against her, Hillary Clinton is still going to be the next president. That’s how bad her opponent is.[/quote]
Rigging against her? LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL[/quote]
Yes, rigging against here. The fake email scandal has had more news coverage on all cable and network news shows in excess of all other issues combined. Despite it being a fake scandal. There is nothing to see. So yes. The election has been rigged far more against her than against Trump, with regards to media coverage.
The actual voting rigging that Trump has talked about is all bullshit. It doesn’t exist. The sum total of all in person voter fraud over the last 15 years would be insufficient to sway a single state election.
