[quote=markmax33]
I’m glad I could correct you on the “End the Fed” business. He has never said he would do anything other than audit the Fed and let the people decide what they would like to do. He has theorized that there would be massive corruption and it would be clear it would need to be fixed but he has not said he would do it without the people behind him. I’m glad to be able provide you new information on this blog that hopefully you will learn from and stop slandering him. I guess there’s always a chance there isn’t massive fraud… What do you think? Absolute power corrupts absolutely? That’s what history has proven. “End the Fed” was a chant from a group of college students that agreed with his assertion that the fed needed to be audited.[/quote]
I’m glad you cleared that up. Ron Paul doesn’t actually want to “end the fed”. You kind of skipped over pri_dk’s point about his book. If he doesn’t want to end the fed, why did he write a book called “End The Fed”, with a list of a dozen or so arguments (many with no factual support) for ending the fed. Was that really just a couple hundred pages of argument to audit the fed? If so, why didn’t he name it “Audit the Fed”?
(You don’t really have to answer this Mark. I won’t hold it against Ron Paul. I will hold the rediculousness of his arguments against him. But not your lack of understanding of what he really wants to do.)
