[quote=markmax33]
He was in the low single digits 4 years ago and now he’s around 20%. That’s a massive increase. He doesn’t have much further to go and he has a kid who can pick up where he leaves off. There is hope for this year and every year forward, you need to wake up and join the movement.[/quote]
Except he’s not around 20%, he’s below 15%. Usually below 10%. Some polling only use landlines, others use both cells & landlines. And by adding 10% to Paul for what you’re considering invalid methods, you’re assuming that somehow this is a negative for Paul and a positive for the other candidates. (That might be true, but I’d like to hear the rationale for it.) Last time around his final average polling number was 6.5%, even with the newest polls, he’s still under 10%. At that rate of improvement, he may be in the fight for the nomination around 2032. When he’ll be 97. He still won’t be electable.
