Kilohana, to answer your question: Shiloh, why is that strange? The certificate was printed recently, based on what the form was at the time. Forms change, systems change. If the Hawaii state goverment says it is legitimate, it is legitimate, regardless of whether it looks like one printed years before or not.
Stange to me in this case because a copy of an original document is a weak certificate. That is almost always true, especially now. If you can print anything on any dated form…how then is it certified? My point is not to question Obama’s birthplace. The point is, the document I viewed calls into question the authenticity. In the end, I suppose it will be researched further…
