Unfortunately you are still stuck into the “bias” game, where you think it’s biased research because they’re “conservative”. You really need to evolve your argument higher than that. Unless you have some real evidence of that research being skewed, you can’t make an assertion like that. Using your example, in court, if you made that assertion, they would ask for your proof or make you withdraw that statement.
As for the statement that the piece makes – that medical innovations would stop – Stossel and others make the statement, but he also shows you the facts and the examples. That is how to present and backup an argument effectively.
It’s just too bad you’re so caught up in the “conservative bad” or “liberal bad”.
