I already buried this subject in a previous post on Piggington.. do I need to locate that post again? Should I throw in the additional info I have? How about the IPCC policy letter for their findings (ie: the scientific work will be adjusted to be consistent with the summary.. all in black and white!).. making the entire IPCC document a political, not scientific document? How about prelim, not yet released copies of the scientific work before editing by the IPCC? How about a letter from 60 scientists (none of them slouches in the subject) indicating that CO2 has very little to do with anthropogenic global warming (against the 20 that the IPCC used..).
Man, will this stupidity never end? First it was global warming (60s) global cooling (70s).. now global warming again!. Global warming conspiratists, give it a rest! Most of you come up with claims of fact, but no scientific basis behind it. Most of the statements are ‘Pavlovian’ in nature; ie I see X and Y, therefore they must be correlated.
