[quote=harvey][quote=CA renter]If the risks are limited, then the rewards should be limited as well.[/quote]
It’s pretty clear that your worldview is driven by a contempt for successful people.
But since, by your own declaration, you have all the answers, please explain to us how your solution to this non-problem would work.
Let’s start with a simple and familiar example:
Explain to us how Bill Gates’ reward should be limited.
This is a softball. Someone as smart as you should knock it out of the park.[/quote]
If a person wants to be protected by limited liability laws, and if they want to put other people’s money at risk, then their compensation should reflect that. IMO, the top pay of an owner/executive in a limited liability corporation should be tied to the compensation of the lowest-paid person at the company. One could also include the compensation and security of shareholders and creditors. There are many possible ways to go about balancing risks and rewards.
