[quote=flu][quote=jpinpb]Just curious, how many of you would be willing to take a 20% cut in your pay? And how many of you risk your lives in your job?[/quote]
Jpinpb… Most of us already do face that threat or have faced that threat if the company/business we work for isn’t doing well or even if doing well, isn’t performing optimum….
The choices are pretty simple.
1)Put up with the pay cut/layoff
or
2)Find another job that pays better.
Again, this is the problem. When the bubble period was here and public sector was having a tough time to get people, perks went up alone with the rest of the other industry…Now that the economy is contracting, there is no revision down, despite that the economy/government budgets cannot sustain these levels of benefits. Unless folks want to pay more taxes (which would only be a temporary solution anyway), there is way around this…The governments cannot afford to be paying these benefits. I don’t see what the big issue here is.. The entire economy is contracting. There are no sacred cows. Private and public sectors both need to scale appropriately.[/quote]
flu,
Please read my earlier post about what **is** happening WRT public safety employees — and what will probably come to pass in one form or another.
I don’t know of a single fire or police department that gave their employees net raises — they might have given them a “raise” but it was offset by the employees’ having to pay more or all of their contributions to their retirement plans, etc.
Many departments across the state, and probably around the country, have had cuts in both pay and benefits. Not sure where the stories about all these raises are coming from. People who are actually in these positions are not seeing it.
“CalPERS is the largest public pension system in the United States with a total fund market value of approximately $180 billion and annual payout obligations of over $10 billion to California pensioners.”
What California spends on illegal immigrants (probably on the low side, because it’s difficult to quantify since we have laws that prevent public agencies from determining immigration status):
“There also are other taxpayer costs — especially through local governments — but those are the biggies for the state. Add them all up and the state spends well over $5 billion a year on illegal immigrants and their families.”
If illegal immigration were fixed, public services (and public servants’ pensions) could be greatly reduced because illegal immigrants consume a significant portion of these public services (schools, hospitals, prisons/law enforcement, financial aid, etc.).
