[quote=flu][quote=joec]I read that if he wins, we’ll have the best looking 1st lady.[/quote]
Yeah, but it’s pretty hard to beat Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, especially if Hillary wins….[/quote]
Luckily we don’t have laws that allow the 1st lady to assume their late husband’s office, sans Mary Bono. And Christina is smoking hot for her age, but like all of my theorems end up being proven correct, Christina was a disaster for Argentina. Avoid extremely hot women for two positions,your wife and your leader. Attractive-yes, sexy-yes, voluptuous-yes-yes. But supermodel hot-no! She’s crazy!!
I hate politics, but the CFK reference reminds me of some of the parallels of this election and one of the most dysfunctional governments of the modern age, Argentina. Isabel Peron and CFK were both first lady’s who ended up succeeding their dead husbands. All smoking hot, all had a hand in taking a country with incredible potential and stature at one point to a comedic demise. Their greatest export is the lessons on how not to run a country into the ground. It’s just odd that we may be voting for a former first lady in the next election. Now Hillary is not Peron or CFK, so the super model hot theorem doesn’t actually apply here. But I’d like to see a woman be the president, just not a smoking hot one and I’m nervous about former first ladies just because of the history. But Hillary is attractive without being a super hot so I feel better that if say Christina Hendricks was running, cause I’d do whatever she said until we were were banging pots in the street because there was no food and inflation was 40%.
Oh and don’t hate on trumps wife for having plastic surgery, she looks good in both pictures. She probably feels better in the second picture and believe me, a woman who looks pretty but feels ugly is miserable and crazy and she will make you that way. You are better off with one that looks pretty and feels pretty, so I’m in support of whatever it takes to make that happen.
