flu wrote:If they were

[bearishgurl]

[quote=flu]If they were married > 7 years, it’s much more complicated than that.[/quote]

You are correct, flu. Conversely, if they were married < 10 years, the lower-earning or non-earning spouse is not eligible for permanent spousal support orders in CA. This does not preclude a lump-sum settlement being made, however. http://www.divorcelawfirms.com/resources/divorce/spousal-support/california-alimony-spousal-support-laws.htm

I can't even begin to tell you how many women have approached me to prepare a disso packet or response packet for them who initially believe that they can stay living where they are, stay unemployed and no facet of their financial lives will change during and after the pendency of their divorce. Delusion is rampant in this regard.

I've seen a LOT in my day and ... amicable or not, this "happy story" doesn't make any sense here, IMO.