ER, when a patron is visibly drunk at a bar, the vast majority of bartenders will refuse to serve them and call them a cab. It should be ditto for casinos. Why are casinos “extending credit for chips” to “known regular gamblers?”
That’s bullsh!t !!
CA Indian casinos, in particular, are supposed to be contributing a certain percentage of their profits to state-sponsored “gambling addiction education.”
I don’t understand how someone can continue to gamble on a “margin” or a “future-borrowed” acct at a casino in the US, without leaving collateral.
It seems as if some casinos are just allowing credit to those whom they think are “good for the money” without any vetting to see if this is really so :=0
