You are “literally” indistinguishable from a parody account.[/quote]
Whatever you say. Apparently I’m the only one left on this worthless blog who believes were are in an epic bubble. Although all you have to do is check the Fed balance sheet to see the source of the bubble, pretty clear cause and effect.
Back in the last RE bubble, there was a lot more interesting debate here. Now the site is very one sided, clearly because most on here are heavily invested in RE so they all get extremely butt hurt by those mentioning a possible crash. Sorry, don’t like the message? Just blame the messenger. “DZ just has an axe to grind” so we can ignore the oncoming crash. LOL
Sorry, your feelings about me aren’t going to change anything. If the Fed does in fact follow through with the QT, things are going to crash HARD. The market was artificially stimulated with trillions of Pandemic printed money, you think things are going to go well when that is pulled away?[/quote]
I have stated here my view that housing is perilously expensive, and that if rates don’t drop, housing valuations probably will. Outside of housing, I have repeatedly stated my belief that US growth stocks have been in a major speculative bubble that will probably end in a manner typical of bubbles.
The issue isn’t with whether you are bullish or bearish. The issue is with the quality of the commentary, or in your case, the complete absence of quality.
Just in this thread, you’ve said:
“Most cash deals are either investor, or to launder money.”
-> No they aren’t.
(Re. enduring uncertainty while investing in an asset that offers a long-term stream of cash flows) “That’s literally gambling.”
-> No it isn’t.
“Now the site is very one sided, clearly because most on here are heavily invested in RE so they all get extremely butt hurt by those mentioning a possible crash.”
-> Insulting and self-defeating. Going ad-hominem just shows that you’re not capable of making a real argument.
“[various gibbering] the Fed balance sheet”
-> Ah yes, there it is, right on cue. Yes, the Fed matters a lot; nobody disagrees with that. Incessantly mentioning the Fed doesn’t make you more right or add anything to the conversation.
“this worthless blog”
-> Tough but fair.
“The market was artificially stimulated with trillions of Pandemic printed money, you think things are going to go well when that is pulled away?”
-> In fact, I do not think that. Interesting topic to be sure.
I actually wish there were more people representing a reasonable, well-informed bearish viewpoint on this site. So you’re not being singled out (by me anyway) because of your bearish views, but for the complete lack of anything resembling “reasonable” or “well-informed.”
Just about a year ago I wrote this (the context was you, deadzone, using comically bad analysis to “call BS” on something I had written):
[quote=Rich Toscano]Deadzone, your posts are garbage. They are just an endless stream of ill-informed, monomaniacal, combative, and incredibly repetitive rants. I’m tired of seeing them and I’m tired of you dragging every thread into the same endless, pointless, unbelievably tedious debate.
If you have something useful to add to the conversation, such as actual facts or really any topic besides your lunatic obsession with the Fed, please do so — without the pugnacious attitude. Otherwise, you’re going to need to take it somewhere else.[/quote]
And now here I am basically writing the same post again. I don’t know man. Are you going to attempt to be a useful member of this forum at some point? Or should I just save everyone time and ban you now?
