You bring up a very compelling argument. I have not properly considered all aspects of what you say. Society is responsible for dictating acceptable behavior of those in the society for the saftey and happness of those same people. Where the line between acceptable and unacceptable is drawn is arbitrary and debateable. Why not just let people do whatever they want, whenever and to WHOM ever they want? That is what nature does. Nature says survival of the fittest, so why do we include more? If we do, it will impede on someones right to do something. But if we dont intercede, civilization as we know it will crash. So, then what is acceptable intercession into peoples behavior? Interesting mind games. Need to think about that.
