[quote=Blogstar][quote=bearishgurl][quote=Blogstar] . . . BG, I think the judge could rule ex-parte, It seems like the sensible thing to do , especially if I keep it just to the easement interference . . . [/quote]Russ, are you saying here that you are considering NOT pursuing a Quiet Title action?[/quote]
Considering everything. I am not sure it’t needed though less sure it isn’t.
If He settles, can the quiet title easily be dropped? You are saying the quiet title pulls in a lot of protocol? Not crazy about that with such a tight deed and title insurance.[/quote]I think I posted before that in this case, I feel you should pay for a 1-2 hr consultation with a qualified RE attorney where you bring ALL your papers and other “evidence” in (+ preferably a way to listen to audio and watch videos) to determine what your causes of action should be, if any. Since you are paying the attorney for his time and expertise, he’s not likely going to be trying to “sell himself” into representing you during your two hours.
You need a few answers to thorny legal issues which the Piggs (or any stranger) can’t properly give you before moving forward.
