A better idea would be to increase the $2.5 B to something like 50 Billion. That way, each job would be $200K. Then those in that 200K would fall into the top few percent of taxpayers, which can be used to raise additional revenue for more jobs under the program. Brilliant![/quote]
The cost of the program would be $2.5 billion and would result in the employment of 240,000 for a year. There must be some severe cognitive dissonance going on in your head if you just make up BS when you can’t deal with the actual facts.[/quote]
I’m sorry I guess I was not clear enough.
If 2.5B for 240,000 jobs is good, then why not amp up the program to 50 Billion and make those jobs higher-paying ?
I assume that the 240,000 jobs pay more than the 10K it costs the goverment.
