[quote=bearishgurl][quote=Blogstar] . . . I have interviewed 3 now. They all say quiet title even not knowing one thing about the level of perfection of my easement. . . .[/quote]
You shouldn’t have had to “perfect it” if you actually, legitimately “bought it.” The act of being given (legal) title to it in exchange for compensation implies that you are already the owner . . . or in this particular case, the “dominant servient.”[/quote]
That’s what I have been saying. It’s very straight forward on this easement. That’s why I wonder if the quiet title action isn’t easy “churn” for the lawyers , or the best way to start a fight that add$ up? Or as I said earlier maybe courts are requiring it it for CYA even when title is good. Just suspicions. Maybe the neighbor’s belligerent behavior and obstruction constitutes a type of “claim”. That is very unfair and should result in punitive damages , which , so far from how nice I see the system treat the bad guys, isn’t going to happen.
