A lot of posters here are fantastic. They can argue intelligently and process facts. Then there are folks like Casca who are troll-baiters. I think Shadowfax did more than an adequate job explaining the duties of the President of the Harvard Law Review or what Obama’s status was as a Con Law instructor at UoC, but of course, his argument wasn’t addressed.
Frankly, I’ll treat certain posters here with respect (Allan being one of them) even if I disagree with some aspects of their politics, but the courtesy shouldn’t (nor will) be extended to the OP nor Casca.
PS Back in my managing editor days at a law journal at Duke, I frankly didn’t have time to fine-tune my own note for publication. I was too busy making sure that my staff and the authors were on the same page and that the articles were adequately proofed before I had to deal with the publishing house. My grades dropped my 3rd year while dealing with all that crap. Obama managed to pull a magna cum laude at Harvard. If he’s dumber than a box of rocks, I’m afraid to know how we’d classify a number of the posters here.
