[quote=Hobie]Now spending for a transgendered bathroom. Hmm. 🙂

Back on topic.

Quote:
The court effectively ruled that states must convey all benefits to same sex couples as are available to opposite sex couples.

My statement said this is exactly what a civil union does. Followed by ‘strict’ econ perspective.

Emotion aside, just make two columns and compare costs. Just like Econ 200. That is as far as I wanted to discuss because as like the rest here, I don’t care what you do with whomever, wherever, or whatever.

So why haven’t the feminists weighed in the polygamist lifestyle?[/quote]

You might think that civil unions do the same thing. But there have never been any civil union laws, in any state, that actually do the same thing. (If you think there are, find one that grants SS benefits to surviving partners.) So those laws would have to be changed, resulting in identical costs. Beyond that, civil unions for same sex couples, as opposed to legally sanctioned marriage, have already been overturned as unconstitutional.