Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › July job report
- This topic has 20 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by bubba99.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 5, 2011 at 5:42 AM #18994August 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM #715202poorgradstudentParticipant
“Temporary help — a harbinger of permanent hiring – rebounded modestly after declining for three straight months.”
That’s a silver lining that makes me think this slight uptick may be real. Trend-wise private sector has been fairly strong all year, it’s just cutbacks in government employment (which was bloated as part of stimulus spending) that is dragging it down. The uptick in hourly earnings is a positive sign too.
It’s far from all clear skies and roses, but I was personally expecting much worse numbers given market uncertainty. The big lingering question is if government cutbacks will come too quickly and stall the recovery.
August 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM #715292poorgradstudentParticipant“Temporary help — a harbinger of permanent hiring – rebounded modestly after declining for three straight months.”
That’s a silver lining that makes me think this slight uptick may be real. Trend-wise private sector has been fairly strong all year, it’s just cutbacks in government employment (which was bloated as part of stimulus spending) that is dragging it down. The uptick in hourly earnings is a positive sign too.
It’s far from all clear skies and roses, but I was personally expecting much worse numbers given market uncertainty. The big lingering question is if government cutbacks will come too quickly and stall the recovery.
August 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM #716409poorgradstudentParticipant“Temporary help — a harbinger of permanent hiring – rebounded modestly after declining for three straight months.”
That’s a silver lining that makes me think this slight uptick may be real. Trend-wise private sector has been fairly strong all year, it’s just cutbacks in government employment (which was bloated as part of stimulus spending) that is dragging it down. The uptick in hourly earnings is a positive sign too.
It’s far from all clear skies and roses, but I was personally expecting much worse numbers given market uncertainty. The big lingering question is if government cutbacks will come too quickly and stall the recovery.
August 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM #716047poorgradstudentParticipant“Temporary help — a harbinger of permanent hiring – rebounded modestly after declining for three straight months.”
That’s a silver lining that makes me think this slight uptick may be real. Trend-wise private sector has been fairly strong all year, it’s just cutbacks in government employment (which was bloated as part of stimulus spending) that is dragging it down. The uptick in hourly earnings is a positive sign too.
It’s far from all clear skies and roses, but I was personally expecting much worse numbers given market uncertainty. The big lingering question is if government cutbacks will come too quickly and stall the recovery.
August 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM #715895poorgradstudentParticipant“Temporary help — a harbinger of permanent hiring – rebounded modestly after declining for three straight months.”
That’s a silver lining that makes me think this slight uptick may be real. Trend-wise private sector has been fairly strong all year, it’s just cutbacks in government employment (which was bloated as part of stimulus spending) that is dragging it down. The uptick in hourly earnings is a positive sign too.
It’s far from all clear skies and roses, but I was personally expecting much worse numbers given market uncertainty. The big lingering question is if government cutbacks will come too quickly and stall the recovery.
August 5, 2011 at 10:16 AM #715900jstoeszParticipantFlu, personally the Q1 GDP revision was all I needed to jump on board the “government fudges economic data” bandwagon. Then again it could be worse. We could have the Chinese data set.
August 5, 2011 at 10:16 AM #716414jstoeszParticipantFlu, personally the Q1 GDP revision was all I needed to jump on board the “government fudges economic data” bandwagon. Then again it could be worse. We could have the Chinese data set.
August 5, 2011 at 10:16 AM #716052jstoeszParticipantFlu, personally the Q1 GDP revision was all I needed to jump on board the “government fudges economic data” bandwagon. Then again it could be worse. We could have the Chinese data set.
August 5, 2011 at 10:16 AM #715297jstoeszParticipantFlu, personally the Q1 GDP revision was all I needed to jump on board the “government fudges economic data” bandwagon. Then again it could be worse. We could have the Chinese data set.
August 5, 2011 at 10:16 AM #715207jstoeszParticipantFlu, personally the Q1 GDP revision was all I needed to jump on board the “government fudges economic data” bandwagon. Then again it could be worse. We could have the Chinese data set.
August 5, 2011 at 9:26 PM #715507CAwiremanParticipantGood post FLU. NPR radio article commented on the jobs report. I believe they said, we need to add 300,000 jobs per month, for 5 years to get back to a 6 % unemployment level.
August 5, 2011 at 9:26 PM #715417CAwiremanParticipantGood post FLU. NPR radio article commented on the jobs report. I believe they said, we need to add 300,000 jobs per month, for 5 years to get back to a 6 % unemployment level.
August 5, 2011 at 9:26 PM #716109CAwiremanParticipantGood post FLU. NPR radio article commented on the jobs report. I believe they said, we need to add 300,000 jobs per month, for 5 years to get back to a 6 % unemployment level.
August 5, 2011 at 9:26 PM #716262CAwiremanParticipantGood post FLU. NPR radio article commented on the jobs report. I believe they said, we need to add 300,000 jobs per month, for 5 years to get back to a 6 % unemployment level.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.