Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Civita in Mission Valley
- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 5, 2011 at 10:39 AM #18698April 5, 2011 at 1:06 PM #683584briansd1Guest
Seems like a nice development in Mission Valley.
I wish the development were denser without any single family houses at all.Compared to prices downtown, and Hillcrest, the prices in Mission Valley are reasonable, IMO.
The new developments are definitely better in that they incorporate public spaces and retail.
It’s interesting that they are using the word “blurban” to describe the community — a blur between urban and suburban.
http://www.newgeography.com/content/001913-a-new-word-development
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/dec/01/civita-begins-mission-valley/I’ve always maintained that neighborhoods such as Mira Mesa, Carmel Valley, Clairemont, etc… despite being inside city limits are really suburbs (houses surrounding small strip malls).
There are so many opportunities to build inside the city instead of sprawling to the suburbs and exurbs.
The trolley should be improved with higher speed cars and expanded to other areas of the city and into the airport.
Here’s a nice new development inside the city of Philadelphia.
http://www.atthepiazza.com/April 5, 2011 at 1:06 PM #684760briansd1GuestSeems like a nice development in Mission Valley.
I wish the development were denser without any single family houses at all.Compared to prices downtown, and Hillcrest, the prices in Mission Valley are reasonable, IMO.
The new developments are definitely better in that they incorporate public spaces and retail.
It’s interesting that they are using the word “blurban” to describe the community — a blur between urban and suburban.
http://www.newgeography.com/content/001913-a-new-word-development
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/dec/01/civita-begins-mission-valley/I’ve always maintained that neighborhoods such as Mira Mesa, Carmel Valley, Clairemont, etc… despite being inside city limits are really suburbs (houses surrounding small strip malls).
There are so many opportunities to build inside the city instead of sprawling to the suburbs and exurbs.
The trolley should be improved with higher speed cars and expanded to other areas of the city and into the airport.
Here’s a nice new development inside the city of Philadelphia.
http://www.atthepiazza.com/April 5, 2011 at 1:06 PM #683636briansd1GuestSeems like a nice development in Mission Valley.
I wish the development were denser without any single family houses at all.Compared to prices downtown, and Hillcrest, the prices in Mission Valley are reasonable, IMO.
The new developments are definitely better in that they incorporate public spaces and retail.
It’s interesting that they are using the word “blurban” to describe the community — a blur between urban and suburban.
http://www.newgeography.com/content/001913-a-new-word-development
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/dec/01/civita-begins-mission-valley/I’ve always maintained that neighborhoods such as Mira Mesa, Carmel Valley, Clairemont, etc… despite being inside city limits are really suburbs (houses surrounding small strip malls).
There are so many opportunities to build inside the city instead of sprawling to the suburbs and exurbs.
The trolley should be improved with higher speed cars and expanded to other areas of the city and into the airport.
Here’s a nice new development inside the city of Philadelphia.
http://www.atthepiazza.com/April 5, 2011 at 1:06 PM #684407briansd1GuestSeems like a nice development in Mission Valley.
I wish the development were denser without any single family houses at all.Compared to prices downtown, and Hillcrest, the prices in Mission Valley are reasonable, IMO.
The new developments are definitely better in that they incorporate public spaces and retail.
It’s interesting that they are using the word “blurban” to describe the community — a blur between urban and suburban.
http://www.newgeography.com/content/001913-a-new-word-development
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/dec/01/civita-begins-mission-valley/I’ve always maintained that neighborhoods such as Mira Mesa, Carmel Valley, Clairemont, etc… despite being inside city limits are really suburbs (houses surrounding small strip malls).
There are so many opportunities to build inside the city instead of sprawling to the suburbs and exurbs.
The trolley should be improved with higher speed cars and expanded to other areas of the city and into the airport.
Here’s a nice new development inside the city of Philadelphia.
http://www.atthepiazza.com/April 5, 2011 at 1:06 PM #684267briansd1GuestSeems like a nice development in Mission Valley.
I wish the development were denser without any single family houses at all.Compared to prices downtown, and Hillcrest, the prices in Mission Valley are reasonable, IMO.
The new developments are definitely better in that they incorporate public spaces and retail.
It’s interesting that they are using the word “blurban” to describe the community — a blur between urban and suburban.
http://www.newgeography.com/content/001913-a-new-word-development
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/dec/01/civita-begins-mission-valley/I’ve always maintained that neighborhoods such as Mira Mesa, Carmel Valley, Clairemont, etc… despite being inside city limits are really suburbs (houses surrounding small strip malls).
There are so many opportunities to build inside the city instead of sprawling to the suburbs and exurbs.
The trolley should be improved with higher speed cars and expanded to other areas of the city and into the airport.
Here’s a nice new development inside the city of Philadelphia.
http://www.atthepiazza.com/April 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM #683593edna_modeParticipantI seem to recall that as recently as Xmas 2010, that Mission Valley tends to flood to the NORTH of the river. Isn’t this development on the same side as Fashion Valley Mall?
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/02/flood-plan-raises-issues/
From this I am forced to conclude that optimism encourages short-term memory loss.
April 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM #684768edna_modeParticipantI seem to recall that as recently as Xmas 2010, that Mission Valley tends to flood to the NORTH of the river. Isn’t this development on the same side as Fashion Valley Mall?
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/02/flood-plan-raises-issues/
From this I am forced to conclude that optimism encourages short-term memory loss.
April 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM #683645edna_modeParticipantI seem to recall that as recently as Xmas 2010, that Mission Valley tends to flood to the NORTH of the river. Isn’t this development on the same side as Fashion Valley Mall?
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/02/flood-plan-raises-issues/
From this I am forced to conclude that optimism encourages short-term memory loss.
April 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM #684414edna_modeParticipantI seem to recall that as recently as Xmas 2010, that Mission Valley tends to flood to the NORTH of the river. Isn’t this development on the same side as Fashion Valley Mall?
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/02/flood-plan-raises-issues/
From this I am forced to conclude that optimism encourages short-term memory loss.
April 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM #684273edna_modeParticipantI seem to recall that as recently as Xmas 2010, that Mission Valley tends to flood to the NORTH of the river. Isn’t this development on the same side as Fashion Valley Mall?
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/02/flood-plan-raises-issues/
From this I am forced to conclude that optimism encourages short-term memory loss.
April 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM #684278edna_modeParticipantLet me amend that to: NORTH of I-8.
April 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM #684773edna_modeParticipantLet me amend that to: NORTH of I-8.
April 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM #684419edna_modeParticipantLet me amend that to: NORTH of I-8.
April 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM #683598edna_modeParticipantLet me amend that to: NORTH of I-8.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.