- This topic has 65 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 11, 2010 at 8:40 PM #17335April 11, 2010 at 9:33 PM #538290
NotCranky
ParticipantIt’s nice of you to post that. I wish I could use the good advice but I bought raw land and the improvements are assessed pretty much dead on with current prices.
April 11, 2010 at 9:33 PM #538412NotCranky
ParticipantIt’s nice of you to post that. I wish I could use the good advice but I bought raw land and the improvements are assessed pretty much dead on with current prices.
April 11, 2010 at 9:33 PM #539242NotCranky
ParticipantIt’s nice of you to post that. I wish I could use the good advice but I bought raw land and the improvements are assessed pretty much dead on with current prices.
April 11, 2010 at 9:33 PM #538975NotCranky
ParticipantIt’s nice of you to post that. I wish I could use the good advice but I bought raw land and the improvements are assessed pretty much dead on with current prices.
April 11, 2010 at 9:33 PM #538879NotCranky
ParticipantIt’s nice of you to post that. I wish I could use the good advice but I bought raw land and the improvements are assessed pretty much dead on with current prices.
April 12, 2010 at 9:31 AM #538361EconProf
ParticipantLand and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.
April 12, 2010 at 9:31 AM #538482EconProf
ParticipantLand and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.
April 12, 2010 at 9:31 AM #539311EconProf
ParticipantLand and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.
April 12, 2010 at 9:31 AM #539045EconProf
ParticipantLand and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.
April 12, 2010 at 9:31 AM #538949EconProf
ParticipantLand and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.
April 12, 2010 at 11:41 AM #539115NotCranky
Participant[quote=EconProf]Land and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.[/quote]
I can’t, In part because I bought it cheap at the time.It closed in 2004 so a little ahead of your suggested window too. It would be hard to defend a case with comps. I actually thought the dealings with the assessor’s office on improvements was fair. Their guidelines were reasonable.April 12, 2010 at 11:41 AM #539382NotCranky
Participant[quote=EconProf]Land and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.[/quote]
I can’t, In part because I bought it cheap at the time.It closed in 2004 so a little ahead of your suggested window too. It would be hard to defend a case with comps. I actually thought the dealings with the assessor’s office on improvements was fair. Their guidelines were reasonable.April 12, 2010 at 11:41 AM #539019NotCranky
Participant[quote=EconProf]Land and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.[/quote]
I can’t, In part because I bought it cheap at the time.It closed in 2004 so a little ahead of your suggested window too. It would be hard to defend a case with comps. I actually thought the dealings with the assessor’s office on improvements was fair. Their guidelines were reasonable.April 12, 2010 at 11:41 AM #538431NotCranky
Participant[quote=EconProf]Land and lots have fallen by a bigger percentage than buildings. Your assessment breaks down land and improvements–so if you can show comps to prove your land component went down you can win a lower total assessment.[/quote]
I can’t, In part because I bought it cheap at the time.It closed in 2004 so a little ahead of your suggested window too. It would be hard to defend a case with comps. I actually thought the dealings with the assessor’s office on improvements was fair. Their guidelines were reasonable. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.