Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Does foreclosure void existing rental contracts?
- This topic has 40 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by 2009 Buyer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 22, 2009 at 4:15 PM #15924June 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM #418926SDEngineerParticipant
It used to, but no longer.
Under new rules, tenants do have the right to the term of their lease – however, it is subject to two very important caveats:
1) A dwelling purchased by someone who intends to occupy the home themselves can issue a 90 day notice to the tenants and void their lease in that fashion. Someone purchasing a home as a rental investment, however, must honor the existing lease subject to the second condition below.
2) Any lease must be “fair market value” – so no total sweetheart multi-year deals or anything of that sort.
June 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM #419492SDEngineerParticipantIt used to, but no longer.
Under new rules, tenants do have the right to the term of their lease – however, it is subject to two very important caveats:
1) A dwelling purchased by someone who intends to occupy the home themselves can issue a 90 day notice to the tenants and void their lease in that fashion. Someone purchasing a home as a rental investment, however, must honor the existing lease subject to the second condition below.
2) Any lease must be “fair market value” – so no total sweetheart multi-year deals or anything of that sort.
June 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM #419423SDEngineerParticipantIt used to, but no longer.
Under new rules, tenants do have the right to the term of their lease – however, it is subject to two very important caveats:
1) A dwelling purchased by someone who intends to occupy the home themselves can issue a 90 day notice to the tenants and void their lease in that fashion. Someone purchasing a home as a rental investment, however, must honor the existing lease subject to the second condition below.
2) Any lease must be “fair market value” – so no total sweetheart multi-year deals or anything of that sort.
June 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM #419653SDEngineerParticipantIt used to, but no longer.
Under new rules, tenants do have the right to the term of their lease – however, it is subject to two very important caveats:
1) A dwelling purchased by someone who intends to occupy the home themselves can issue a 90 day notice to the tenants and void their lease in that fashion. Someone purchasing a home as a rental investment, however, must honor the existing lease subject to the second condition below.
2) Any lease must be “fair market value” – so no total sweetheart multi-year deals or anything of that sort.
June 22, 2009 at 4:54 PM #419155SDEngineerParticipantIt used to, but no longer.
Under new rules, tenants do have the right to the term of their lease – however, it is subject to two very important caveats:
1) A dwelling purchased by someone who intends to occupy the home themselves can issue a 90 day notice to the tenants and void their lease in that fashion. Someone purchasing a home as a rental investment, however, must honor the existing lease subject to the second condition below.
2) Any lease must be “fair market value” – so no total sweetheart multi-year deals or anything of that sort.
June 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM #419517PadreBrianParticipantYep, so you basically have 3 months to find a new pad.
June 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM #419448PadreBrianParticipantYep, so you basically have 3 months to find a new pad.
June 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM #419678PadreBrianParticipantYep, so you basically have 3 months to find a new pad.
June 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM #419180PadreBrianParticipantYep, so you basically have 3 months to find a new pad.
June 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM #418951PadreBrianParticipantYep, so you basically have 3 months to find a new pad.
June 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM #419200EconProfParticipantThanks guys.
I should have mentioned…these are commercial tenants in commercial properties.June 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM #419698EconProfParticipantThanks guys.
I should have mentioned…these are commercial tenants in commercial properties.June 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM #419468EconProfParticipantThanks guys.
I should have mentioned…these are commercial tenants in commercial properties.June 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM #418971EconProfParticipantThanks guys.
I should have mentioned…these are commercial tenants in commercial properties. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.