- This topic has 40 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by nostradamus.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 25, 2009 at 6:06 PM #15369March 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM #37323334f3f3fParticipant
There is a fine line between protecting one’s interests and invasion of others’ privacy, and I think this sits on that line. While it is useful to know who you are dealing with in some circumstances, it gives access to information that some may not be able to filter or interpret correctly. For example, how many John Smiths born in 1974 are there? Is someone with a traffic offense really a criminal?
March 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM #37384634f3f3fParticipantThere is a fine line between protecting one’s interests and invasion of others’ privacy, and I think this sits on that line. While it is useful to know who you are dealing with in some circumstances, it gives access to information that some may not be able to filter or interpret correctly. For example, how many John Smiths born in 1974 are there? Is someone with a traffic offense really a criminal?
March 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM #37351534f3f3fParticipantThere is a fine line between protecting one’s interests and invasion of others’ privacy, and I think this sits on that line. While it is useful to know who you are dealing with in some circumstances, it gives access to information that some may not be able to filter or interpret correctly. For example, how many John Smiths born in 1974 are there? Is someone with a traffic offense really a criminal?
March 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM #37373034f3f3fParticipantThere is a fine line between protecting one’s interests and invasion of others’ privacy, and I think this sits on that line. While it is useful to know who you are dealing with in some circumstances, it gives access to information that some may not be able to filter or interpret correctly. For example, how many John Smiths born in 1974 are there? Is someone with a traffic offense really a criminal?
March 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM #37368634f3f3fParticipantThere is a fine line between protecting one’s interests and invasion of others’ privacy, and I think this sits on that line. While it is useful to know who you are dealing with in some circumstances, it gives access to information that some may not be able to filter or interpret correctly. For example, how many John Smiths born in 1974 are there? Is someone with a traffic offense really a criminal?
March 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM #373911nostradamusParticipantI’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.
Anyway, best to be smart and careful with all people, not just ones with records.
March 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM #373794nostradamusParticipantI’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.
Anyway, best to be smart and careful with all people, not just ones with records.
March 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM #373752nostradamusParticipantI’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.
Anyway, best to be smart and careful with all people, not just ones with records.
March 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM #373578nostradamusParticipantI’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.
Anyway, best to be smart and careful with all people, not just ones with records.
March 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM #373298nostradamusParticipantI’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.
Anyway, best to be smart and careful with all people, not just ones with records.
March 26, 2009 at 1:12 PM #373607DoofratParticipant[quote=nostradamus]I’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.[/quote]
That’s what I always tell people, and I add that the goat was acting very very sexy.
March 26, 2009 at 1:12 PM #373782DoofratParticipant[quote=nostradamus]I’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.[/quote]
That’s what I always tell people, and I add that the goat was acting very very sexy.
March 26, 2009 at 1:12 PM #373824DoofratParticipant[quote=nostradamus]I’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.[/quote]
That’s what I always tell people, and I add that the goat was acting very very sexy.
March 26, 2009 at 1:12 PM #373327DoofratParticipant[quote=nostradamus]I’ve known people who were caught having consensual sex in the back of their car and are now labeled “sex offenders”.[/quote]
That’s what I always tell people, and I add that the goat was acting very very sexy.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.