- This topic has 80 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 2, 2008 at 6:48 PM #12929June 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #215726dharmagirlParticipant
wonder if developers in So CA will start “guaranteeing” prices for two years?
I think it’s pretty clever marketing….
June 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #215809dharmagirlParticipantwonder if developers in So CA will start “guaranteeing” prices for two years?
I think it’s pretty clever marketing….
June 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #215833dharmagirlParticipantwonder if developers in So CA will start “guaranteeing” prices for two years?
I think it’s pretty clever marketing….
June 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #215860dharmagirlParticipantwonder if developers in So CA will start “guaranteeing” prices for two years?
I think it’s pretty clever marketing….
June 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM #215887dharmagirlParticipantwonder if developers in So CA will start “guaranteeing” prices for two years?
I think it’s pretty clever marketing….
June 2, 2008 at 9:27 PM #215801AnonymousGuestIt sounds illegal to me.
Specifically, it seems to violate the Security Acts of 1933 and 1934 which prohibit the marketing of an unregistered security.Let’s keep an eye on this and see where it goes.
June 2, 2008 at 9:27 PM #215883AnonymousGuestIt sounds illegal to me.
Specifically, it seems to violate the Security Acts of 1933 and 1934 which prohibit the marketing of an unregistered security.Let’s keep an eye on this and see where it goes.
June 2, 2008 at 9:27 PM #215963AnonymousGuestIt sounds illegal to me.
Specifically, it seems to violate the Security Acts of 1933 and 1934 which prohibit the marketing of an unregistered security.Let’s keep an eye on this and see where it goes.
June 2, 2008 at 9:27 PM #215908AnonymousGuestIt sounds illegal to me.
Specifically, it seems to violate the Security Acts of 1933 and 1934 which prohibit the marketing of an unregistered security.Let’s keep an eye on this and see where it goes.
June 2, 2008 at 9:27 PM #215935AnonymousGuestIt sounds illegal to me.
Specifically, it seems to violate the Security Acts of 1933 and 1934 which prohibit the marketing of an unregistered security.Let’s keep an eye on this and see where it goes.
June 2, 2008 at 9:31 PM #215889PadreBrianParticipanthahah, try finding them in 2 years. lol
June 2, 2008 at 9:31 PM #215968PadreBrianParticipanthahah, try finding them in 2 years. lol
June 2, 2008 at 9:31 PM #215941PadreBrianParticipanthahah, try finding them in 2 years. lol
June 2, 2008 at 9:31 PM #215914PadreBrianParticipanthahah, try finding them in 2 years. lol
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.