- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by davelj.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 13, 2008 at 12:21 PM #12094March 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM #168747Deal HunterParticipant
Yeah, it’s common practice in business to move money on a regualar bases. The banks report about 1 million SAR’s each month. I think Spitzer was targeted (or has been for a long time). He made lots of enemies and I’m sure it wasnt’ hard to find someone willing to put a tail on his accounts for some reason or another.
Another article showed he tried to deduct $48K in “non-food entertainment” on his Schedule C in 2006. I didn’t even know there was such a category on schedule C!
March 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM #169078Deal HunterParticipantYeah, it’s common practice in business to move money on a regualar bases. The banks report about 1 million SAR’s each month. I think Spitzer was targeted (or has been for a long time). He made lots of enemies and I’m sure it wasnt’ hard to find someone willing to put a tail on his accounts for some reason or another.
Another article showed he tried to deduct $48K in “non-food entertainment” on his Schedule C in 2006. I didn’t even know there was such a category on schedule C!
March 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM #169084Deal HunterParticipantYeah, it’s common practice in business to move money on a regualar bases. The banks report about 1 million SAR’s each month. I think Spitzer was targeted (or has been for a long time). He made lots of enemies and I’m sure it wasnt’ hard to find someone willing to put a tail on his accounts for some reason or another.
Another article showed he tried to deduct $48K in “non-food entertainment” on his Schedule C in 2006. I didn’t even know there was such a category on schedule C!
March 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM #169183Deal HunterParticipantYeah, it’s common practice in business to move money on a regualar bases. The banks report about 1 million SAR’s each month. I think Spitzer was targeted (or has been for a long time). He made lots of enemies and I’m sure it wasnt’ hard to find someone willing to put a tail on his accounts for some reason or another.
Another article showed he tried to deduct $48K in “non-food entertainment” on his Schedule C in 2006. I didn’t even know there was such a category on schedule C!
March 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM #169105Deal HunterParticipantYeah, it’s common practice in business to move money on a regualar bases. The banks report about 1 million SAR’s each month. I think Spitzer was targeted (or has been for a long time). He made lots of enemies and I’m sure it wasnt’ hard to find someone willing to put a tail on his accounts for some reason or another.
Another article showed he tried to deduct $48K in “non-food entertainment” on his Schedule C in 2006. I didn’t even know there was such a category on schedule C!
March 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM #168753daveljParticipantTypically, unless the amount of money is greater than $10,000 and involves CASH, a Suspicious Activities Report (or SAR) is not triggered. If you’re just wiring money around domestically and/or between accounts over which you have authority, it’s generally not an issue. More often than not, the big issue with SARs is with CASH or large wires to countries that are tax havens or on the government’s watch list for terrorism.
The reason that Eliot Spitzer’s transactions got flagged is because he’s a public official, so there’s a higher degree of scrutiny by banks, the FBI, etc. The investigation got started once they saw several cash transactions of less than $10,000 spaced by only a few days in some cases (suggesting “structuring,” as a way to stay under the $10,000 limit) and wires to entities that looked like shell companies, AND noted that he was a public official. Had he not been a public official, I think there’s a 99% chance nothing would have come of this. For the average person out there, the BSA is a non-issue. Just go about your business and its highly unlikely you’ll ever be bothered by it.
99.9% of SARs don’t even get reviewed. They just sit in a regulatory database somewhere.
March 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM #169188daveljParticipantTypically, unless the amount of money is greater than $10,000 and involves CASH, a Suspicious Activities Report (or SAR) is not triggered. If you’re just wiring money around domestically and/or between accounts over which you have authority, it’s generally not an issue. More often than not, the big issue with SARs is with CASH or large wires to countries that are tax havens or on the government’s watch list for terrorism.
The reason that Eliot Spitzer’s transactions got flagged is because he’s a public official, so there’s a higher degree of scrutiny by banks, the FBI, etc. The investigation got started once they saw several cash transactions of less than $10,000 spaced by only a few days in some cases (suggesting “structuring,” as a way to stay under the $10,000 limit) and wires to entities that looked like shell companies, AND noted that he was a public official. Had he not been a public official, I think there’s a 99% chance nothing would have come of this. For the average person out there, the BSA is a non-issue. Just go about your business and its highly unlikely you’ll ever be bothered by it.
99.9% of SARs don’t even get reviewed. They just sit in a regulatory database somewhere.
March 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM #169082daveljParticipantTypically, unless the amount of money is greater than $10,000 and involves CASH, a Suspicious Activities Report (or SAR) is not triggered. If you’re just wiring money around domestically and/or between accounts over which you have authority, it’s generally not an issue. More often than not, the big issue with SARs is with CASH or large wires to countries that are tax havens or on the government’s watch list for terrorism.
The reason that Eliot Spitzer’s transactions got flagged is because he’s a public official, so there’s a higher degree of scrutiny by banks, the FBI, etc. The investigation got started once they saw several cash transactions of less than $10,000 spaced by only a few days in some cases (suggesting “structuring,” as a way to stay under the $10,000 limit) and wires to entities that looked like shell companies, AND noted that he was a public official. Had he not been a public official, I think there’s a 99% chance nothing would have come of this. For the average person out there, the BSA is a non-issue. Just go about your business and its highly unlikely you’ll ever be bothered by it.
99.9% of SARs don’t even get reviewed. They just sit in a regulatory database somewhere.
March 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM #169089daveljParticipantTypically, unless the amount of money is greater than $10,000 and involves CASH, a Suspicious Activities Report (or SAR) is not triggered. If you’re just wiring money around domestically and/or between accounts over which you have authority, it’s generally not an issue. More often than not, the big issue with SARs is with CASH or large wires to countries that are tax havens or on the government’s watch list for terrorism.
The reason that Eliot Spitzer’s transactions got flagged is because he’s a public official, so there’s a higher degree of scrutiny by banks, the FBI, etc. The investigation got started once they saw several cash transactions of less than $10,000 spaced by only a few days in some cases (suggesting “structuring,” as a way to stay under the $10,000 limit) and wires to entities that looked like shell companies, AND noted that he was a public official. Had he not been a public official, I think there’s a 99% chance nothing would have come of this. For the average person out there, the BSA is a non-issue. Just go about your business and its highly unlikely you’ll ever be bothered by it.
99.9% of SARs don’t even get reviewed. They just sit in a regulatory database somewhere.
March 13, 2008 at 12:40 PM #169110daveljParticipantTypically, unless the amount of money is greater than $10,000 and involves CASH, a Suspicious Activities Report (or SAR) is not triggered. If you’re just wiring money around domestically and/or between accounts over which you have authority, it’s generally not an issue. More often than not, the big issue with SARs is with CASH or large wires to countries that are tax havens or on the government’s watch list for terrorism.
The reason that Eliot Spitzer’s transactions got flagged is because he’s a public official, so there’s a higher degree of scrutiny by banks, the FBI, etc. The investigation got started once they saw several cash transactions of less than $10,000 spaced by only a few days in some cases (suggesting “structuring,” as a way to stay under the $10,000 limit) and wires to entities that looked like shell companies, AND noted that he was a public official. Had he not been a public official, I think there’s a 99% chance nothing would have come of this. For the average person out there, the BSA is a non-issue. Just go about your business and its highly unlikely you’ll ever be bothered by it.
99.9% of SARs don’t even get reviewed. They just sit in a regulatory database somewhere.
March 13, 2008 at 12:47 PM #169094pencilneckParticipantdavelj probably knows a lot more about this than I do, but I read (in another article about Spitzer) that the $10k trigger is a popularly believed myth.
March 13, 2008 at 12:47 PM #169193pencilneckParticipantdavelj probably knows a lot more about this than I do, but I read (in another article about Spitzer) that the $10k trigger is a popularly believed myth.
March 13, 2008 at 12:47 PM #169115pencilneckParticipantdavelj probably knows a lot more about this than I do, but I read (in another article about Spitzer) that the $10k trigger is a popularly believed myth.
March 13, 2008 at 12:47 PM #169087pencilneckParticipantdavelj probably knows a lot more about this than I do, but I read (in another article about Spitzer) that the $10k trigger is a popularly believed myth.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.